[Bigiron]

[EvertonDiehard]

The ruling party has always claimed to be pro-business so they have to be pro-employer, which makes them definitely not pro-workers. Many PAP members serve as advisors to NTUC-affiliated unions. How are they able to fully advocate for workers' interests?

[Bigiron]

This guy explains why 

https://youtu.be/aThjX4rsnfk?si=nLe0lPDplOJ4O88_

[EvertonDiehard]

As long as there are no specific anti-discrimination laws in place, competent older workers are not receiving adequate protection from discrimination based on their age rather than their ability; those affected by forced lay-offs will consider making official complaints nothing but a waste of time. This clearly shows that the SG Govt is not pro-worker. Changes to the Retirement and Re-employment Act represent official acknowledgement that most current white collar work is knowledge or technology based. Employees are theoretically able to continue their careers well into their sixties. Even though the Govt has long acknowledged the problem of ageism in SG, it has maintained that introducing anti-discriminatory laws could increase business costs and undermine our economic competitiveness. Such an assertion does not appear to be accurate since the global competitiveness of nations with anti-discrimination laws, such as the United States, Britain, Germany, the Netherlands, Hong Kong, Japan, Finland and Sweden, remains relatively stable. 

[Ola]

This Shoot Blank Queen is never Pro- Worker either

She is only pro- LHL and nothing else

[Alice Alicia]

When was pap ever pro-worker?

[Tee tiong huat]

Party from opp and as well from running party also is playing politic...