Lawrence Wong: No Need to Cut Fuel Costs. $100 Vouchers are Better
#1

Lawrence Wong: No Need to Cut Fuel Costs. $100 Vouchers are Better


https://kuanyewism.com/2022/04/lawrence-...re-better/
Reply
#2

No need to pay the mps mayors every month since they r oso rich to afford the high costs of living  Rolleyes

There is no right or wrong decisions. 
One only has to bear the consequences that one makes  Big Grin
[+] 3 users Like Galilo_l's post
Reply
#3

Greedy. That’s all I can say.

tomorrow will be a better day
[+] 1 user Likes surfer's post
Reply
#4

end of the day, commoner who doesn't own car will indirectly pay for the increase fuel cost.
simple logic, businessman will never absorb the increase in business cost, their customers will ultimately
pay for it, probably even more.
yes, these people are damn greedy, and like to bulldoze their agenda across, thinking that we are daft.

.
[+] 2 users Like whylah's post
Reply
#5

They doubled the fuel tax not long ago, right?
Reply
#6

But but but what about business that need transport running on fuel? Same logic applies?
Reply
#7

The logic is not wrong but the amount is way too small. Rise in fuel costs will be passed on to consumers. $100 enough?
Reply
#8

no need to cut fuel cost?
i think better cut the minister salary.
best is cut off pap in the parliament. 
make sense?
[+] 2 users Like jus4lucky's post
Reply
#9

CDC vouchers also the cause of higher price in the hawker centres. Many hawkers are raising price to suck up the vouchers.
Reply
#10

LW is silly to think that fuel is a luxury goods. Seems like he don't know that higher fuel price lead to higher business cost that must be pass on to consumers. Govt of many countries are cutting fuel tax because they know fuel is not progressive tax. But Sg govt is ignorant.
[+] 2 users Like Instinct's post
Reply
#11

(04-04-2022, 06:33 PM)Bigiron Wrote:  Lawrence Wong: No Need to Cut Fuel Costs. $100 Vouchers are Better


https://kuanyewism.com/2022/04/lawrence-...re-better/

会有报应的

I am just a tiny plankton in the ocean.
Reply
#12

looks like idiots are running this country.

idontknowhatosay

[Image: hopeless-shake-head.gif]
[+] 1 user Likes menghuii's post
Reply
#13

its crazy that the fuel is so expensive .. but we need to thank US and Russia for this war that fked everyone
[+] 1 user Likes keys's post
Reply
#14

Who still believe he will be next PM? Rotfl
Total out of reach from general public…
羊毛出在羊身上 lah…


[Image: 88-F12841-3-D28-4-ED5-B7-C6-7783347-D100-E.gif]

“Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind"
Reply
#15

I don't drive, so I agree voucher better, as long as bus/MRT fares don't increase Wink
[+] 1 user Likes starbugs's post
Reply
#16

(04-04-2022, 07:11 PM)Galilo_l Wrote:  No need to pay the mps mayors every month since they r oso rich to afford the high costs of living  Rolleyes

it is not a q of whether they are rich or not

it is absolutely waste ytax payer money to feed these redundant mayors,not even worth to pay them S$0.1
[+] 1 user Likes talky's post
Reply
#17

(05-04-2022, 10:04 AM)Rainforest Wrote:  会有报应的
i agreed 110%
Reply
#18

as i hv said $100 is NEVER ENOUGH TO OFFSET THE INCREASES
GIVE US $500,IT  IS JUST BARELY ENOUGH ,JUST THE STARTING LEVEL
WHEN OIL GOES TO $150 WILL WE GET ANOTHER $800???
Reply
#19

These ppl will never admit that they are the one cost the inflation. Always disguise as thought they are angel by giving out voucher.Oppression is getting greater each day.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)