Those take Sinovac, better take extra ah Tiong jabs to up the antibodies
SCMP pro Xi? Where have you been?
It is like saying CNN is pro Trump
Booster sms I received liow … at first thinking of mixing with ah Tiong jab …… guess not liow
Low count is good. As long it can fetch more faster next time. You don't mobilizes all reservists
for 3 months. 5months , 9 months. You how much reserves to spend. If mobilizes all rebellion how?
Take 10th shot better more antibodies ready to .... ?
Then more antibodies ... still teo now how?
southchina post is angmo media . Train people to be stupid. So we love others to be stupid?
(08-11-2021, 07:07 PM)Tangsen Wrote: [ -> ]Booster sms I received liow … at first thinking of mixing with ah Tiong jab …… guess not liow
Ok. Good for you. No one can force you.
But bringing up an old article to create a divide? Wonder what's your agenda?
It is common knowledge that lots of anti bodies does not equal effectivenes. We only have to look at our daily cases.
I rest my case.
Up antibody not good sign why?
Prior to jab(codes-proteins in lipids to trick) does not exist in nature.
In this case as u are the person being jabbed we presume u are not exposed to a Factory(HUMAN)
and therefore as far as u r concerned, it does not exist in nature
and therefore it is a poison YOU not updated(Immune system)
U cannot register something not exist in nature per Patent office.
But if u are an expert in reading patents u can make it a Business
there are alot of hanky panky.
But when this kind of maktui meets Attorney at law Nuremburg codes,
Patent office becomes uncomfortable
(08-11-2021, 07:45 PM)RichDad Wrote: [ -> ]Ok. Good for you. No one can force you.
But bringing up an old article to create a divide? Wonder what's your agenda?
It is common knowledge that lots of anti bodies does not equal effectivenes. We only have to look at our daily cases.
I rest my case.
No agenda, just bring forward information to all. It's for them to decide. People have the right to have information to make educated decision, does not matter whether it support one or against another. You prefer the PRCunts way? Media blackout?
(08-11-2021, 07:50 PM)Tangsen Wrote: [ -> ]No agenda, just bring forward information to all. It's for them to decide. People have the right to have information to make educated decision, does not matter whether it support one or against another. You prefer the PRCunts way? Media blackout?
Old article lah, halo. People have read and discussed it ad nauseam.
Same for those who keep bringing up anti mRNA articles. What's their agenda?
(08-11-2021, 07:53 PM)RichDad Wrote: [ -> ]Old article lah, halo. People have read and discussed it ad nauseam.
Same for those who keep bringing up anti mRNA articles. What's their agenda?
Old but I just found out mah …. like that also got agenda … you worried issit?
(08-11-2021, 07:48 PM)RichDad Wrote: [ -> ]So in your mind, ang moh always right?
So be it...
Covid got ang moh version meh …. vaccine got race one har?
(08-11-2021, 07:57 PM)Tangsen Wrote: [ -> ]Covid got ang moh version meh …. vaccine got race one har?
Vaccines got angmoh vaccines, China's vaccines, India's vaccines, Russian vaccine.
(08-11-2021, 07:42 PM)Tangsen Wrote: [ -> ]Noted, Prof cf9, the head of medical research in SGtalk Lab specialising in viral respiratory disease and vaccines 
thats only pri 6 standard dear tangsen.
(08-11-2021, 07:55 PM)Tangsen Wrote: [ -> ]Old but I just found out mah …. like that also got agenda … you worried issit?
Relac lah. Why I worry? Not worth worrying about lah.
I rather watch my netflix...
Bye....
(08-11-2021, 07:07 PM)Tangsen Wrote: [ -> ]Booster sms I received liow … at first thinking of mixing with ah Tiong jab …… guess not liow
if you think antibodies count is the key as HC, then mRNA option is suitable for your decision.
It is indeed true mRNA boost higher antibodies.
Antibodies number can help to fight against virus better
but it does not meant antibodies can recognize virus better.
So despite antibodies is 10 times difference, the efficacy is not 10 times difference.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-healt...NKBN29N141
The trial state that 20% increase for group that take 3 weeks instead of 2 weeks.
Sinovac efficacy against wuhan variant covid is 50.4% for jab taken in two weeks
and around 70% for those taken three weeks.
Some one post saying sinovac jab is taken four weeks apart in Sg.
It is your choice.
(08-11-2021, 08:08 PM)cf9 Wrote: [ -> ]thats only pri 6 standard dear tangsen.
Thanks, lucky I no from RI …. at least
(08-11-2021, 06:22 PM)Tangsen Wrote: [ -> ]Those take Sinovac, better take extra ah Tiong jabs to up the antibodies
If there's virus infecting your body then your body will produce antibodies to fight the virus. If there's no virus infecting your body, what's the use of so many antibodies in your body? Is this question logical? Can u answer it?
Waiting for Valneva to rise and sell. They just went for global offerings. Either sell these few days or later.
(08-11-2021, 09:46 PM)winbig Wrote: [ -> ]If there's virus infecting your body then your body will produce antibodies to fight the virus. If there's no virus infecting your body, what's the use of so many antibodies in your body? Is this question logical? Can u answer it?
I am not a medical scientist. You better ask a doctor but then in this forum there are social media certified medical PHD researchers, you can go ask them but believe at your own risk
(08-11-2021, 09:32 PM)Tangsen Wrote: [ -> ]Chairman Deng said "No matter if it is a mRNA vaccine or a non mRNA vaccine; as long as it can catches CoVid, it is a good vaccine."
You are quoting Chairman Deng X P......you substitute car for vaccines...very creative- well done...
