SG Talk

Full Version: Investigations reveal discrepancies in Israel’s Gaza hospital attack claims
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
The United Nations on Friday called for an independent international investigation into a devastating blast at a packed hospital in Gaza City last week.
Israel has claimed that the Palestinian rocket that it says supposedly hit the hospital was fired from the southwest.

However, the conclusions of two analyses published on Friday express serious doubt in that narrative – and found that the projectile that hit the hospital was fired from the direction of Israel.

Forensic Architecture, a research group based at the University of London, analysed photos of the impact crater at the scene, saying that “patterns of radial fragmentation on the southwest side of the impact crater, as well as a shallow channel leading into the crater from the northeast” indicate the projectile likely came from the northeast – “the direction of the Israeli-controlled side of the Gaza perimeter”.
All it conclude is that the object of interest come from the certain direct, however, it does not mean the object of interest is from Israel. Afterall, in the live stream, a rocket clearly show a 180 degree change in direction. Some ignorant people may doubt rocket can drastically change in direction but today's world is such a great world, we got records of nice things like

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6IwqmezeSuQ

As shown in the video, trajectory for fail launch can indeed boomerang back thus it does not conflict with the sound and ground analysis in aspect of direction while completely align with live stream of the rocket of interest.
The Israeli army also released a video with a recording of a conversation between purported Hamas officials, where they appear to talk about the misfired rocket that had caused the hospital blast.

Earshot said that a forensic sound analysis revealed that the audio was recorded on two separate channels, and then edited together, disqualifying it from being a credible source of evidence.

In its analysis of the audio, Channel 4 said it had found the call’s credibility questionable due to the syntax used, accent and tone of voice.
(22-10-2023, 11:16 PM)Lu5ck Wrote: [ -> ]All it conclude is that the object of interest come from the certain direct, however, it does not mean the object of interest is from Israel. Afterall, in the live stream, a rocket clearly show a 180 degree change in direction. Some ignorant people may doubt rocket can drastically change in direction but today's world is such a great world, we got records of nice things like

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6IwqmezeSuQ

As shown in the video, trajectory for fail launch can indeed boomerang back thus it does not conflict with the sound and ground analysis in aspect of direction while completely align with live stream of the rocket of interest.

You forensic investigator is it?

Talk like an expert, what is your BIG NAME har?

Are you one of the regular nicks but dare not show yourself and so created this new nick just to spew this on-going rubbish from you?

Dun be a coward, use your original nick
So far, there appears to be no conclusive evidence to determine who was behind the second blast, the one that hit al-Ahli hospital. A number of organisations have suggested that the relatively small crater left by the attack appears incompatible with weapons habitually launched by Israel.

However, the use of a different type of artillery cannot be ruled out.

Play Video
Video Duration 02 minutes 51 seconds
02:51
Israel’s targeting of civilian areas: Strikes have hit hospitals, aid agencies & schools
The investigative journalism group Bellingcat identified what appeared to be the impact crater after analysing footage and images of the aftermath. In a preliminary analysis, the group said the ground surrounding one side of the crater showed a cone of scarring and pitting, consistent with the explosion of a munition at this site.

Marc Garlasco, a military adviser at the PAX Protection of Civilians team, noted the impact point did not appear to be consistent with the 500, 1000 or 2000-pound bombs used in Joint Direct Attack Munitions (JDAMs) used by Israel, according to the Bellingcat report.

Channel 4 journalists who visited the site in the aftermath of the incident also reported seeing small craters compatible with mortar strikes rather than missiles. Surrounding buildings only had superficial damage and no structural collapse.

The broadcaster said “this makes a ground detonating Israeli missile strike unlikely, but it doesn’t rule out an airburst munition which could cause major loss of life but would produce far less structural damage.”
of course israel has to deny its them
becos later
after war is overthey will be charge with war crimes
it is illegal to bomb a hosptal
Argue and talk no use....winner is the king while loser need to obey.....thls law practice thousands of years already...
It doesn’t matter whether it is 50 or 500 deaths in the hospital bombing.


The objective is to flatten Gaza and the number of deaths do not matter.


So far, Gaza bombing is still a long way to go.


Get more pop corns