SG Talk

Full Version: Straits Times front page typo
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
“ This Facebook post is no longer available. It may have been removed or the privacy settings of the post may have changed.”
Anyway, they have edited their online version 

https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/e...ity-report
Original header gives a complete different meaning. Sounds like they prioritize using single use items.
(17-12-2023, 08:04 AM)Buffybuffy Wrote: [ -> ]Original header gives a complete different meaning. Sounds like they prioritize using single use items.

First world newspaper can’t even spell prioritise correctly.  Why are taxpayers still funding this crappy ruling party propaganda newsletter leh? Sad
(17-12-2023, 08:06 AM)p1acebo Wrote: [ -> ]First world newspaper can’t even spell prioritise correctly.  Why are taxpayers still funding this crappy ruling party propaganda newsletter leh? Sad
Own blood brother also reading it. Entertaining.
(17-12-2023, 08:10 AM)Buffybuffy Wrote: [ -> ]Own blood brother also reading it. Entertaining.

Will the writer and the editor lose their bonuses? Big Grin
Prc editor. Stupid
Some time back, they printed unknowingly the prick of a footballer. Quite a big group picture. 

Lol
Chinese Zaobao also has some 错别字  frequently. I see liao also shake head… Rotfl
(17-12-2023, 08:01 AM)Buffybuffy Wrote: [ -> ]Are you trying to show this?

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=903818217774048&set=a.347769153378960&type=3

this is solid evidence that SPH cannot ownself check ownself.

SPH needs competition from another private newspaper company.
(17-12-2023, 02:12 PM)forum456 Wrote: [ -> ]this is solid evidence that SPH cannot ownself check ownself.

SPH needs competition from another private newspaper company.
SBS, SMRT and go head are all private companies. 

Need to name some more examples?