Dyson employees retrenched from its Singapore office are believed to have received the usual one month's pay per year of service. But the union speaking out on their behalf says it's "concerned" over the lack of details on the package.
https://cna.asia/4dBm9xf
Supervisor and magement staff don't need union come in lah...
(03-10-2024, 07:49 AM)Bigiron Wrote: [ -> ]Dyson employees retrenched from its Singapore office are believed to have received the usual one month's pay per year of service. But the union speaking out on their behalf says it's "concerned" over the lack of details on the package.
https://cna.asia/4dBm9xf
this kind of thing already solved in western countries at least 20 years ago.
singapore will never solve this problem because there is no labour law for companies to comply.
even china has better labour laws than singapore because retrenchment benefits are part of labour laws in china
(03-10-2024, 08:20 AM)forum456 Wrote: [ -> ]this kind of thing already solved in western countries at least 20 years ago.
singapore will never solve this problem because there is no labour law for companies to comply.
even china has better labour laws than singapore because retrenchment benefits are part of labour laws in china
voters need to vote against PAP.
PAP will have no choice but to make retrenchment benefits into the labour laws.
if not, PAP will never make retrenchment benefits into the labour laws
Pro business or pro workers, cannot hv both
(03-10-2024, 08:30 AM)WhatDoYouThink! Wrote: [ -> ]Pro business or pro workers, cannot hv both
Got country than got home ,also got factory than got workers lah....
1) Singapore labour law was already established since under British control.
2) Executive staff are not covered under labour law. Those Engineers and above are considered executive staff.
3) if the company pay retrenchment benefits to those Executive staff, it is only as a gesture of goodwill.
4) In the past, when the company wanted a staff to leave, they just informed you that you are terminated. No retrenchment benefits were given. You can go lodge a complaint to mom, but they would tell you nothing could be done since you are an executive staff there.
(03-10-2024, 08:30 AM)WhatDoYouThink! Wrote: [ -> ]Pro business or pro workers, cannot hv both
just do what is right.
you cannot be pro-business at the expense of workers or pro-worker at the expense of business.
just state in the work contract whether the company will pay retrenchment benefits and inform workers of retrenchment by 1 month notice.
let workers decide if they want to sign this kind of work contract.
just be transparent and honest.
business cannot anyhow retrench workers at anytime or last minute.
(03-10-2024, 08:47 AM)Clyde Wrote: [ -> ]1) Singapore labour law was already established since under British control.
2) Executive staff are not covered under labour law. Those Engineers and above are considered executive staff.
3) if the company pay retrenchment benefits to those Executive staff, it is only as a gesture of goodwill.
4) In the past, when the company wanted a staff to leave, they just informed you that you are terminated. No retrenchment benefits were given. You can go lodge a complaint to mom, but they would tell you nothing could be done since you are an executive staff there.
voters can vote against PAP to change all these issues.
(03-10-2024, 08:30 AM)WhatDoYouThink! Wrote: [ -> ]Pro business or pro workers, cannot hv both
Pro business and pro employer lor