SG Talk

Companies can get up to S$72,000 in wage support to send staff abroad
https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/singapo...aff-abroad



The article contains two main inconsistencies:

1. Eligibility Requirements vs. Support Amount: The article states that companies must pay employees on overseas postings a fixed monthly salary of at least S$4,000 to be eligible for the program. However, it also mentions that the salary support is capped at S$5,000 per month. This creates an inconsistency because it's unclear how companies with employees earning more than S$5,000 per month would be supported.

2. Program Duration: The article mentions a 6-month minimum posting duration but also states that the support is available for up to 9 months. This discrepancy could create uncertainty for companies regarding the program's duration and the amount of support they can receive.

These inconsistencies could lead to confusion for companies trying to understand the program's requirements and benefits. A clearer explanation of the program's eligibility criteria and the specific support available for different scenarios would be helpful.

Here's how the article uses roundabout answers:

- Focus on Financial Support: The article primarily focuses on the financial support provided by the OMIP, which is a tangible benefit. However, it doesn't fully explain how this financial support will contribute to the overall success of companies' overseas expansion.

- Vague Description of Networking and Cultural Learning: The article mentions networking opportunities and cultural learning as potential benefits, but it doesn't elaborate on how these opportunities will be facilitated or what specific benefits they will provide.

- Lack of Specific Examples: The article doesn't provide any concrete examples of how companies have benefited from similar programs in the past or how the OMIP will be implemented in practice.

Instead of providing a clear and concise explanation of the program's benefits, the article relies on vague statements and general descriptions. This roundabout approach makes it difficult for companies to understand the true value of the OMIP and how it will contribute to their overseas expansion goals.

Another way to siphon money to cronies?

The article contains several ambiguities that could make it difficult for companies to fully understand the OMIP program and its requirements:
 
1. "Quantifiable Short-Term KPIs": The article mentions the need for "quantifiable short-term KPIs" but doesn't specify what these KPIs should be or how they will be measured. This vagueness could lead to ambiguity and difficulty in evaluating the program's effectiveness. Companies might struggle to understand what specific performance indicators are expected and how they will be assessed.

2. Program Eligibility for Companies with Higher-Paying Employees: The article states that companies must pay employees on overseas postings a fixed monthly salary of at least S$4,000. However, it also mentions that the salary support is capped at S$5,000 per month. This ambiguity leaves companies unsure about the support available for employees earning more than S$5,000 per month.

3. Program's Overall Impact: The article emphasizes the financial support provided by the OMIP, but it doesn't provide a clear and concise explanation of the program's overall benefits. It mentions networking opportunities and cultural learning, but these aspects are not fully explored. This lack of clarity could make it difficult for companies to understand the program's true value and its potential impact on their overseas expansion efforts.

4. Program's Implementation: The article doesn't provide details about how the program will be implemented, such as the application process, selection criteria, or the support provided to companies beyond financial assistance. This lack of information could create uncertainty for companies interested in participating in the program.
 
These ambiguities could hinder companies' ability to make informed decisions about participating in the OMIP. A more detailed and transparent explanation of the program's requirements, benefits, and implementation would be beneficial for potential participants.