20-12-2024, 06:53 PM
20-12-2024, 06:57 PM
身份证号码风波:还好政府没有甩锅，派出两位部长道歉“减损”
Source: Redants.sg
Author: 祥子
Date: 2024年12月20日
Theme: This article discusses the recent controversy surrounding the government's decision to stop partially hiding Singaporean identity card numbers, which sparked public concern and debate.
Core Points:
- The government's decision to stop partially hiding identity card numbers has caused confusion and anxiety among the public.
- The decision was made to reduce the risk of identity theft by shifting from using identity card numbers as authentication to identification.
- The government acknowledges that the change was not communicated effectively, leading to public concern and a hasty implementation by the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority (ACRA).
- To address these concerns, two ministers, Ms. Josephine Teo and Ms. Indranee Rajah, held a press conference to explain the situation and apologize for the government's missteps.
- The apology is seen as a "damage control" measure to prevent the public from perceiving the government as "passing the buck" to ACRA.
Phenomenon:
- The article highlights the importance of clear communication between government agencies and the public, particularly regarding sensitive issues like personal data.
- It also emphasizes the need for government transparency and accountability, especially when mistakes are made.
- The article uses the example of the "TraceTogether" app controversy in 2019 to illustrate how government missteps can erode public trust.
- The article also touches upon the growing concern over scams and identity theft, highlighting the public's anxiety about the potential misuse of their personal information.
Conclusion:
The article concludes that while the government's decision to stop partially hiding identity card numbers may have been well-intentioned, the lack of clear communication and hasty implementation led to unnecessary public anxiety. The ministers' apology is seen as a necessary step to restore public trust and prevent further damage.
Source: Redants.sg
Author: 祥子
Date: 2024年12月20日
Theme: This article discusses the recent controversy surrounding the government's decision to stop partially hiding Singaporean identity card numbers, which sparked public concern and debate.
Core Points:
- The government's decision to stop partially hiding identity card numbers has caused confusion and anxiety among the public.
- The decision was made to reduce the risk of identity theft by shifting from using identity card numbers as authentication to identification.
- The government acknowledges that the change was not communicated effectively, leading to public concern and a hasty implementation by the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority (ACRA).
- To address these concerns, two ministers, Ms. Josephine Teo and Ms. Indranee Rajah, held a press conference to explain the situation and apologize for the government's missteps.
- The apology is seen as a "damage control" measure to prevent the public from perceiving the government as "passing the buck" to ACRA.
Phenomenon:
- The article highlights the importance of clear communication between government agencies and the public, particularly regarding sensitive issues like personal data.
- It also emphasizes the need for government transparency and accountability, especially when mistakes are made.
- The article uses the example of the "TraceTogether" app controversy in 2019 to illustrate how government missteps can erode public trust.
- The article also touches upon the growing concern over scams and identity theft, highlighting the public's anxiety about the potential misuse of their personal information.
Conclusion:
The article concludes that while the government's decision to stop partially hiding identity card numbers may have been well-intentioned, the lack of clear communication and hasty implementation led to unnecessary public anxiety. The ministers' apology is seen as a necessary step to restore public trust and prevent further damage.
20-12-2024, 07:07 PM
既然没有错，道歉什么？
20-12-2024, 07:08 PM
Obviously TS didn't read the article - 
Quote:身份证的主要用途是识别身份（identifier），把身份证号当作身份验证（authenticator）的做法存在风险，必须改变。