SG Talk

The US was the first to discover this kill switch planted in the solar panels they have been using. After tt,  the same findings were confirmed by Denmark and also UK news media. It was reported tt this kill switch is located in the electronic inverter circuit and can turn off the electricity remotely and communicate thro’ fire walls .

https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/c...025-05-14/

(26-05-2025, 06:42 AM)revealer Wrote: [ -> ]The US was the first to discover this kill switch planted in the solar panels they have been using. After tt,  the same findings were confirmed by Denmark and also UK news media. It was reported tt this kill switch is located in the electronic inverter circuit and can turn off the electricity remotely and communicate thro’ fire walls .

https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/c...025-05-14/

Kill switch in solar panel is a safety device lah. Go ask AI.

It can kill of Gris Power if it is insert into the Grid system as a Ai item

(26-05-2025, 07:13 AM)winbig Wrote: [ -> ]Kill switch in solar panel is a safety device lah. Go ask AI.

It can always be construed as a safety device, but it is described as having a communication network that can break firewalls.  If it is a safety device,  the manual would have specified its purposes, and the misunderstanding would not have arisen.  There are various safety devices such as over-voltage, over-current devices etc, inside an inverter or any electronic circuit, and never read about the need of having a communicable and remote kill switch,  unless they are fabricating the story.

Do read the comments here:

https://www.reddit.com/r/cybersecurity/c..._us_solar/

Just hours before Miliband’s visit to Yorkshire, it was reported that American engineers had discovered the presence of secret components in Chinese-made power inverters used by US solar farms.

Power inverters take the DC electricity generated by solar panels and change it into a AC format the grid can use.

The parts, which were not included in any schematics, included communication devices such as cellular radios that would bypass other protections and allow the inverters to be remotely disabled.

(26-05-2025, 08:07 AM)Tee tiong huat Wrote: [ -> ]Just hours before Miliband’s visit to Yorkshire, it was reported that American engineers had discovered the presence of secret components in Chinese-made power inverters used by US solar farms.

Power inverters take the DC electricity generated by solar panels and change it into a AC format the grid can use.

The parts, which were not included in any schematics, included communication devices such as cellular radios that would bypass other protections and allow the inverters to be remotely disabled.

In other words, it represents a potential “kill switch”.


If replicated elsewhere...
experts warned it could pose a serious threat to grid security. Shutting off even three to four gigawatts (GW) of capacity at once can trigger a cascading wave of power cuts in a modern electricity network.

(26-05-2025, 08:00 AM)teaserteam Wrote: [ -> ]It can always be construed as a safety device, but it is described as having a communication network that can break firewalls.  If it is a safety device,  the manual would have specified its purposes, and the misunderstanding would not have arisen.  There are various safety devices such as over-voltage, over-current devices etc, inside an inverter or any electronic circuit, and never read about the need of having a communicable and remote kill switch,  unless they are fabricating the story.

This kind of problem is unique in communist countries, where the communist Government has too much control over how private companies run their businesses.  Even if the kill switch is meant to be a safety device,  it is construed by Western countries as a kill switch.  This is all because they have found undocumented communication devices that can break firewalls.

(26-05-2025, 07:13 AM)winbig Wrote: [ -> ]Kill switch in solar panel is a safety device lah. Go ask AI.

Such killer if insert into handphone or some smaller others device how?.

(26-05-2025, 08:00 AM)teaserteam Wrote: [ -> ]It can always be construed as a safety device, but it is described as having a communication network that can break firewalls.  If it is a safety device,  the manual would have specified its purposes, and the misunderstanding would not have arisen.  There are various safety devices such as over-voltage, over-current devices etc, inside an inverter or any electronic circuit, and never read about the need of having a communicable and remote kill switch,  unless they are fabricating the story.

"It can always be construed as a safety device, it is described as having a communication network that can break firewalls...OMG.