最新一篇由陈迎竹写 “新战争能换醒帝国梦？“
陈迎竹， 如果你替美国 plp 谴责俄国，那你有没有 谴责美国胆敢在联合国造假用一小罐洗衣粉指责伊拉克拥有大杀伤力武器而灭了伊拉克，又公然谋杀伊拉克总统。除了伊拉克，还有利比亚，叙利亚，阿富汗，委内瑞拉，亚非欧美到整个世界？
别来那套双标吧 ！！！
。
灯塔烂剧本还有许多人相信。
不是智障，脑残是什么？
媒體的問題雖然大，但是人民的意識要足。
不然就很容易被牽著走，這才是重點。
先莫怪他人，如果自己都那麼輕易相信別人所說的。那只能怪自己。
畢竟媒體”一般”都是政府的”發聲工具”，不是嗎？
(14-03-2022, 08:02 AM)webinarian Wrote: [ -> ]最新一篇由陈迎竹写 “新战争能换醒帝国梦？“
陈迎竹， 如果你替美国 plp 谴责俄国，那你有没有 谴责美国胆敢在联合国造假用一小罐洗衣粉指责伊拉克拥有大杀伤力武器而灭了伊拉克，又公然谋杀伊拉克总统。除了伊拉克，还有利比亚，叙利亚，阿富汗，委内瑞拉，亚非欧美到整个世界？
别来那套双标吧 ！！！
。
This is a classic joke from US.
(14-03-2022, 08:19 AM)WhatDoYouThink? Wrote: [ -> ]走狗这里也不少。至少有十来只吧。。。
各为其主！
只是他们把良心给卖了。
Their views are aligned with the sg govt and Singapore interest.
There are many here attacking sg govt position and out to undermine Sjngapore.....beware those are the hanjian against sg.
(14-03-2022, 08:23 AM)RiseofAsia Wrote: [ -> ]各为其主！
只是他们把良心给卖了。
背宗忘祖的香蕉人那里会有良心？
(14-03-2022, 08:24 AM)sgbuffett Wrote: [ -> ]Their views are aligned with the sg govt and Singapore interest.
There are many here attacking sg govt position and out to undermine Sjngapore.....beware those are the hanjian against sg.
The one who undermine Singapore is the FM.
(14-03-2022, 08:24 AM)sgbuffett Wrote: [ -> ]Their views are aligned with the sg govt and Singapore interest.
There are many here attacking sg govt position and out to undermine Sjngapore.....beware those are the hanjian against sg.
We don't take sides hor!
We have principles hor!
(14-03-2022, 08:56 AM)cityhantam Wrote: [ -> ]We don't take sides hor!
We have principles hor!
Yes, we don't take sides, and we sanction Russia.
(14-03-2022, 09:01 AM)Clyde Wrote: [ -> ]Yes, we don't take sides, and we sanction Russia.
Thanks for our one sided pro American Bananas and Rojaks in govt
(14-03-2022, 08:24 AM)sgbuffett Wrote: [ -> ]Their views are aligned with the sg govt and Singapore interest.
There are many here attacking sg govt position and out to undermine Sjngapore.....beware those are the hanjian against sg.
Sure or not?
When Russia nationalized foreign nations' asset, Whose interest lost? When we don't gain any thing but the loss of Singapore's investments in 4 Russian airports already happened.
What do we get from sanctioning Russia? plp US only, right?
.
We r forced at gun pointing at our head...no choice ss we r beholden to cowboy, damned aggressive arrogant even telling mighty china wat n wat not to do.
When US invaded Iraq, is it not in the interest to condemn US, for the same reason of protecting our national interest, right, SgFett?
.
(14-03-2022, 09:09 AM)Yin yang Wrote: [ -> ]We r forced at gun pointing at our head...no choice ss we r beholden to cowboy, damned aggressive arrogant even telling mighty china wat n wat not to do.
But our beloved FM talked like a Saint!
(14-03-2022, 09:09 AM)Yin yang Wrote: [ -> ]We r forced at gun pointing at our head...no choice ss we r beholden to cowboy, damned aggressive arrogant even telling mighty china wat n wat not to do.
No, Israel didn't sanction.
Saudi and UAE also.
![[Image: Ukraine23.png]](https://i.ibb.co/GJ5F2gk/Ukraine23.png)
.
(14-03-2022, 09:05 AM)webinarian Wrote: [ -> ]
Sure or not?
When Russia nationalized foreign nations' asset, Whose interest lost? When we don't gain any thing but the loss of Singapore's investments in 4 Russian airports already happened.
What do we get from sanctioning Russia? plp US only, right?
.
There will be economic losses when we do economic sanctions.
But if we don't do it we can lose much more ...like a rules based international order critical to our survival.
If we say its okay for a big country to invade a small country...we put ourselves at risk as thus can be used against us.
Singapore has fighters and ships and a sizable defense force what is there to stop a big country to use a faux justification to say they feel threatened by Singapore and have right to invade us.
(14-03-2022, 09:14 AM)sgbuffett Wrote: [ -> ]But if we don't do it we can lose much more ...like a rules based international order critical to our survival.
Rules based???
Whose rules are you talking about?
Assmerica's rules are international rules???
(14-03-2022, 09:14 AM)sgbuffett Wrote: [ -> ]There will be economic losses when we do economic sanctions.
But if we don't do it we can lose much more ...like a rules based international order critical to our survival.
If we say its okay for a big country to invade a small country...we put ourselves at risk as thus can be used against us.
Singapore has fighters and ships and a sizable defense force what is there to stop a big country to use a faux justification to say they feel threatened by Singapore and have right to invade us.
Investments gone not heavy losses?
What interest or gain from the sanction?
You mean if we don't sanction, Singapore will be invaded?
Singapore also almost invaded Malaysia when Mahathir wanted to stop water supply. Is it because Malaysia didn't sanction others?
Don't be naive!!!
.
SgFett, Don't give such stupid reason "Sanction Russia so that Singapore won't be invaded".
Singapore almost invaded Malaysia on water supply issue.
It is not because Malaysia didn't sanction other countries, ok?
If we sanction for invasion, then, we should also sanction US for so many invasions all over the world including invasion of Iraq.
.
Any rule-based international order advocate should be applied to all consistently instead only selectively applied on certain country only. US can break all international rules all the time and no one cares.
Otherwise it can become an international clown.
.
I am so glad Singapore made such blatant mistake. It would not be good for Singaporeans if they don't.
(14-03-2022, 08:24 AM)CHAOS Wrote: [ -> ]背宗忘祖的香蕉人那里会有良心？
aiya, 读了几年羊书，就自以为是头羊了
Putin planned to destroy us economy faster.now us cannot print $$$$.the only way is global reset