SG Talk

Full Version: Nuclear energy could supply about 10% of Singapore's needs by 2050,
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Nuclear energy could supply about 10% of Singapore's needs by 2050, according to a report commissioned by EMA: https://str.sg/wnQ4

Importing more clean energy into Singapore and maximising solar panel deployment are some ways Singapore can reach net-zero emissions by 2050: https://str.sg/wnQZ
Can't even handle the electricity players (fucking the end users as always) yet wanna talk about nuclear energy...
Nuclear energy, once deemed unsuitable for Singapore. The identified as a potential power source for the country by 2050 in a new report published on Tuesday (March 22).


The report, commissioned by the Energy Market Authority (EMA), concluded that nuclear energy could by 2050 supply about 10 per cent of the country's needs, with advancements in nuclear technology making it safer and more reliable.

Rolleyes The potential use of nuclear energy in Singapore's power mix had been identified in one of three scenarios in the Energy 2050 Committee report.
Do 10% or do 100% if something went wrong, the consequences will be the same. Then the waste dispose where?
(22-03-2022, 02:06 PM)Teeth53 Wrote: [ -> ]Nuclear energy, once deemed unsuitable for Singapore. The identified as a potential power source for the country by 2050 in a new report published on Tuesday (March 22).

The report, commissioned by the Energy Market Authority (EMA), concluded that nuclear energy could by 2050 supply about 10 per cent of the country's needs, with advancements in nuclear technology making it safer and more reliable.

Rolleyes The potential use of nuclear energy in Singapore's power mix had been identified in one of three scenarios in the Energy 2050 Committee report.
Singapore exploring tapping nuclear energy by 2050

https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/e...050-report
Many countries are using this method now. 
With oil pricing so high, its one of the options.
https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapor...dy-2578596

EMA noted, there are ongoing efforts to decarbonise the power sector, such as its earlier announced target to import up to four gigawatts of low-carbon electricity by 2035. Also taking active steps to invest in the research of low-carbon technologies, such as hydrogen and geothermal energy, and...continues.

Monitor global developments in areas such as nuclear energy and their implications for Singapore.
(22-03-2022, 02:00 PM)Sticw Wrote: [ -> ]Can't even handle the electricity players (fucking the end users as always) yet wanna talk about nuclear energy...
Water......How?.
SG dont need 10m on the island lah. Better pray PAP get voted out....not more oppositions.
(22-03-2022, 02:10 PM)dynamite Wrote: [ -> ]Do 10% or do 100% if something went wrong, the consequences will be the same. Then the waste dispose where?
Clapping ☆¿♡ Chirstmas Island
(22-03-2022, 02:22 PM)Migrant Wrote: [ -> ]Many countries are using this method now. 
With oil pricing so high, its one of the options.
Should go, have build a reactor last decade??. .10 yr ago...
I'm okay with it, but just don't build the plant in SG. Any where it's build, home prices will plunge even if it's safe. Maybe build the nuclear power plant in AU and use submarine cable to transit to SG. Same cable as the solar project. Day time from solar, night time from nuclear.
(22-03-2022, 02:46 PM)Teeth53 Wrote: [ -> ]Should go, have build a reactor last decade??. .10 yr ago...
Nuclear generator need to have safety radius. Singapore got the space meh?..(2050 ok. 10%)
(22-03-2022, 02:50 PM)starbugs Wrote: [ -> ]I'm okay with it, but just don't build the plant in SG. Any where it's build, home prices will plunge even if it's safe. Maybe build the nuclear power plant in AU and use submarine cable to transit to SG. Same cable as the solar project. Day time from solar, night time from nuclear.

Mostly under the sea in or under ground
10% nia...not worth the risk.
(22-03-2022, 02:51 PM)Teeth53 Wrote: [ -> ]Nuclear generator need to have safety radius. Singapore got the space meh?..(2050 ok. 10%)

Nuclear fusion is a reaction in which two or more atomic nuclei are combined to form one or more different atomic nuclei and subatomic particles. The difference in mass between the reactants and products is manifested as either the release or the absorption of energy. Wikipedia
Can build one at Orchard Rd?
(22-03-2022, 04:00 PM)cityhantam Wrote: [ -> ]Can build one at Orchard Rd?
Bomb Blushing
What's their definition of affordability? Green n clean products/services always cost more  Big Grin
(22-03-2022, 02:22 PM)Migrant Wrote: [ -> ]Many countries are using this method now. 
With oil pricing so high, its one of the options.

Those countries with nuclear energy are all big countries with lots of land. If something happen to the nuclear power plant it'll just affect a small percent of their total land size. One nuclear accident will render whole of Singapore unliveable.
I like I like ….. part of national defence ….. peaceful time … we use the electricity 
If war ….. if anyone effectively invade into SG ….. we press a button …… 一起


[Image: Castle-Romeo.jpg]
Better ask your next gen to migrate, if they really build one in Sg…. Rotfl

They create the problem of mass importing but they don’t know how to solve the energy problem effectively… Just stop importing lah…. How come want to take the stupid risk?
(22-03-2022, 04:00 PM)cityhantam Wrote: [ -> ]Can build one at Orchard Rd?
Build one at Tanglin...