(24-04-2022, 05:22 AM)kokee Wrote: [ -> ]china is just a thief or robber in technology or copy cat, reversed engineering, no invention & innovation due to their mindset already brainwwash cannot think out of box.
in military, china is much much worse than in IT, IT is already so much backwards compared to US.
as below china military is only 20% of US, 20% already over rated, all these moronic comie dogs use all the lies from communist source, can only use mouth & words, not physical or even tested openly, no one seen before, empty shell, all BS & with their super backward IC, need US IC, all these wet dream comie dogs here, can only spam rubbish video to con or brainwash morons here.
china join hand with russia is just peanut to US military.
china military is just a total joke, look at russia junk weapons in Ukraine war, china is few generation behind such junk.
all these BS videos by communist source, no physical unit just make a video to con or brainwash morons, from video to test to perfect needs long time.
talk about military & weapons, china is easily 50 yrs behind US today, whether is sky, sea or land weapons.
china carrier is bloody built by Ukraie which is a total junk unwanted & abandoned by russia & ukraine.
the rest of weapons, china is totally untested, dont have advanced IC, use all old junk IC like russia, most weapons also based on today junk russia weapons used in ukraine war, totally 50 yrs old technology compared to today US & NATO weapons.
yet dont talk about war information & experience.
Video dedicated to 10th Anniversary Chinese carrier operation in 2022.
It covers the 1st CV16 Liaoning purchased from Ukraine in 1990s and commissioned in Sep 2012, then self-build CV-17 Shandong in 2017 and finally currently on sea trial advanced CV-18 Fujian.
(08-01-2023, 11:14 AM)Manthink Wrote: [ -> ]Errr....US navy does not operate the Chinook..
In fact, your video shows a US Army bird.
It is funny, but the Chinook and Apache helicopters are under the army, whereas the F-16, F-35 jets pilots are under the Navy.........it is different from Singapore...
(08-01-2023, 11:27 AM)debono Wrote: [ -> ]It is funny, but the Chinook and Apache helicopters are under the army, whereas the F-16, F-35 jets pilots are under the Navy.........it is different from Singapore...
Errr...incorrect - USN does not operate the F-16. Only for training purpose.
(08-01-2023, 07:55 PM)Manthink Wrote: [ -> ]Errr....1st you mistakenly thought the USN operates the Chinook. And now you claim the helo is a "fighter jet" ???
Speaking of jet fighter - Found another "leaked" photo of multiple drones on the deck of CV-17 Shandong carrier.
Clearly the Chinese is pushing the boundary of carrier-based tactics...by testing large no. of drones from flat tops. That will align with their plan to increase operational experience using maritime drones on carriers in the long run.
(08-01-2023, 08:47 PM)grotesqueness Wrote: [ -> ]you can go ask the pentagon
Why the need to when everyone can see America's war planners are now forced to re-look into their carrier-centric doctrine which they had been using since WW2, after the Chinese ASBM has shown to be able to accurately target carrier-size ships far out into the Pacific ocean ?
(08-01-2023, 08:56 PM)Manthink Wrote: [ -> ]Why the need to when everyone can see America's war planners are now forced to re-look into their carrier-centric doctrine which they had been using since WW2, after the Chinese ASBM has shown to be able to accurately target carrier-size ships far out into the Pacific ocean ?
(08-01-2023, 09:03 PM)grotesqueness Wrote: [ -> ]if you think that is good
my reply is
Huh? Why another pointless reply from you when over a decade ago Pentagon already confirm what I had shared ?
Quote:China has developed a “workable design” of the world’s first anti-ship ballistic missile, potentially capable of hitting and disabling a U.S. aircraft carrier, according to Pentagon officials..
(08-01-2023, 09:14 PM)Manthink Wrote: [ -> ]Quote:
China has developed a “workable design” of the world’s first anti-ship ballistic missile, potentially capable of hitting and disabling a U.S. aircraft carrier, according to Pentagon officials..
my question to you is
is there any proof it will works
is there any proof it has works before
if you think it will works
and the so called enemy thinks it will works
then the pentagon will reply
(08-01-2023, 09:19 PM)grotesqueness Wrote: [ -> ]my question to you is is there any proof it will works
is there any proof it has works before
if you think it will works
and the so called enemy thinks it will works
then the pentagon will reply
LOL! .Previously u suggusted "go ask the pentagon "
Now you don't trust the their statement about Chinese ASBM ?
(08-01-2023, 09:40 PM)grotesqueness Wrote: [ -> ]yes i will STILL suggest u to go ask pentagon and to confirm my reply here
you see there is a saying YOU THINKI THOUGHTWHO COMFIRMHUH!WHO COMFIRM?????
No need to get so triggered lah - Did you missed this ?
![[Image: J-35-Fighter-China-PLANAF.jpg]](https://www.navalnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/J-35-Fighter-China-PLANAF.jpg)
![[Image: Drones-VTOL-aboard-Chinese-Carrier.jpg?a...width=1920]](https://www.thedrive.com/uploads/2022/06/02/Drones-VTOL-aboard-Chinese-Carrier.jpg?auto=webp&auto=webp&optimize=high&quality=70&width=1920)
![[Image: China-Carrier-Target-Maxar.jpg]](https://news.usni.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/China-Carrier-Target-Maxar.jpg)
![[Image: China-DF-21D.jpg]](https://www.19fortyfive.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/China-DF-21D.jpg)
![[Image: dumb-huh.gif]](https://media.tenor.com/riKvVZ2Et-cAAAAM/dumb-huh.gif)
![[Image: laughing-hilarious.gif]](https://media.tenor.com/1aSHGirgw0sAAAAM/laughing-hilarious.gif)
![[Image: mike-tyson-laugh.gif]](https://media.tenor.com/U1S809QD41wAAAAM/mike-tyson-laugh.gif)
![[Image: good-evil.gif]](https://media.tenor.com/M5QmujL5_YQAAAAC/good-evil.gif)