30-07-2022, 09:55 AM
30-07-2022, 10:19 AM
So actually it was SFA's fault in the first place for giving the wrong info!! And they went on to suspend the manufacturer because of that. I am editing CNA's write-up because it is intentionally written to confuse or obfuscate the reader, in trying to absolve SFA from blame 
In response to CNA's queries on Friday, SFA said that it corresponded with Jian Bo on Apr 12 after the food business sought information on whether sorbic acid is allowed.
“SFA informed (Tiong Bahru Tian Bo Shui Kueh) that sorbic acid is allowed in kueh products, up to the maximum permissible limits of 1,000ppm.
"This was incorrect as sorbic acid is only permitted in kueh filling but not kueh,” said SFA, adding that the business was informed on Apr 20 of the correct legal requirements regarding this preservative.
“We regret the miscommunication to Tiong Bahru Tian Bo Shui Kueh that had given them the wrong impression that up to 1,000ppm of sorbic acid was permitted in the production of their kueh products,” said SFA.
As part of its ongoing enforcement efforts, SFA said it conducted an inspection on Jian Bo on Apr 19.
See? Only after SFA did an inspection on 19 Apr then they issued a correction on their mistake on 20 Apr and they went on to suspend the manufacturer over their own mistake.
In response to CNA's queries on Friday, SFA said that it corresponded with Jian Bo on Apr 12 after the food business sought information on whether sorbic acid is allowed.
“SFA informed (Tiong Bahru Tian Bo Shui Kueh) that sorbic acid is allowed in kueh products, up to the maximum permissible limits of 1,000ppm.
"This was incorrect as sorbic acid is only permitted in kueh filling but not kueh,” said SFA, adding that the business was informed on Apr 20 of the correct legal requirements regarding this preservative.
“We regret the miscommunication to Tiong Bahru Tian Bo Shui Kueh that had given them the wrong impression that up to 1,000ppm of sorbic acid was permitted in the production of their kueh products,” said SFA.
As part of its ongoing enforcement efforts, SFA said it conducted an inspection on Jian Bo on Apr 19.
See? Only after SFA did an inspection on 19 Apr then they issued a correction on their mistake on 20 Apr and they went on to suspend the manufacturer over their own mistake.
30-07-2022, 10:31 AM
30-07-2022, 11:15 AM
30-07-2022, 11:55 AM
Leekopek approach to life
30-07-2022, 12:08 PM
30-07-2022, 12:10 PM
Pity Kenneth turned out useless, so different compared to his father