Bill passed protecting S'poreans from online harm; some MPs seek wider powers, others fear curbs on free speech
https://tdy.sg/3fKXMWo
Under a new law passed today, social media sites will be required to block access to harmful content in Singapore within hours.
What happens if the platform refuses:
https://cna.asia/3UI7Td4
>Are likely to cause racial and religious disharmony in Singapore
with Pappies lumping CECA issues under race
(10-11-2022, 08:17 AM)limpeh394 Wrote: [ -> ]>Are likely to cause racial and religious disharmony in Singapore
with Pappies lumping CECA issues under race
Next NK is brewing.
![Laughter-119 Laughter-119](https://sgtalk.net/images/smilies/Animated2/laughter-119.gif)
Already ranked 154th media, still want to raise the ranking to 160th media
敢做怕人说!
my suggestion is to shut the internet
problem solved
Problem is who determines it's harmful content.
PAP's double standards sending conflicting intent
is confusing and dangerous
Their own PAP Dogs spreading lies causing intentional harm is worse
![[Image: Free-Housing-and-Hospital-Care.png]](https://i.ibb.co/zxCcGPV/Free-Housing-and-Hospital-Care.png)
(10-11-2022, 08:59 AM)Blasterlord2 Wrote: [ -> ]Problem is who determines it's harmful content.
MINISTER HAS THE FINAL SAY OVERIDE REGULATING BODY