SG Talk

Bill passed protecting S'poreans from online harm; some MPs seek wider powers, others fear curbs on free speech

https://tdy.sg/3fKXMWo

Under a new law passed today, social media sites will be required to block access to harmful content in Singapore within hours.

What happens if the platform refuses: https://cna.asia/3UI7Td4

block HWZ?

>Are likely to cause racial and religious disharmony in Singapore

with Pappies lumping CECA issues under race

(10-11-2022, 08:17 AM)limpeh394 Wrote: [ -> ]>Are likely to cause racial and religious disharmony in Singapore

with Pappies lumping CECA issues under race

Next NK is brewing.
Already ranked 154th media, still want to raise the ranking to 160th media

敢做怕人说！

my suggestion is to shut the internet
problem solved

Problem is who determines it's harmful content.

PAP's double standards sending conflicting intent

is confusing and dangerous

Their own PAP Dogs spreading lies causing intentional harm is worse

(10-11-2022, 08:59 AM)Blasterlord2 Wrote: [ -> ]Problem is who determines it's harmful content.

MINISTER HAS THE FINAL SAY OVERIDE REGULATING BODY

(10-11-2022, 12:20 PM)talky Wrote: [ -> ]MINISTER HAS THE FINAL SAY OVERIDE REGULATING BODY

Minister is Jo Teo