SG Talk

Full Version: Aukus to help Aussie to nuclearize, can Sg, SK, NK, Iran, also nuclearize?
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
What is the basis for US to sanction NK and Iran to build nuclear weapon when now US is helping Aussie to build nuclear submarines? US is the one who set the rule that besides the existing 5 nuclear powers, no other nation can develop nuclear weapon. That's why US calls for sanction on NK and Iran.  

US claimed China as one breaking international order and rules. Isn't US breaking the rules set up by itself? 

.
(20-09-2021, 01:39 PM)webinarian Wrote: [ -> ]What is the basis for US to sanction NK and Iran to build nuclear weapon when now US is helping Aussie to build nuclear submarines? US is the one who set the rule that besides the existing 5 nuclear powers, no other nation can develop nuclear weapon. That's why US calls for sanction on NK and Iran.  

US claimed China as one breaking international order and rules. Isn't US breaking the rules set up by itself? 

.


[Image: large-7528560.jpg]
(20-09-2021, 01:39 PM)webinarian Wrote: [ -> ]What is the basis for US to sanction NK and Iran to build nuclear weapon when now US is helping Aussie to build nuclear submarines? US is the one who set the rule that besides the existing 5 nuclear powers, no other nation can develop nuclear weapon. That's why US calls for sanction on NK and Iran.  

US claimed China as one breaking international order and rules. Isn't US breaking the rules set up by itself? 

.

It's nuclear powered sub not a nuclear weapon sub.

Nuclear power is used for electricity and even Singapore and Indonesia consider using nuclear power.
(20-09-2021, 03:26 PM)sgbuffett Wrote: [ -> ]It's nuclear powered sub not a nuclear weapon sub.

Nuclear power is used for electricity and even Singapore and Indonesia consider using nuclear power.
Then why NZ banned the nuclear sub from entering its water?..... Thinking
they carry nuclear reactors onboard which is at risk of explosion and killing the crews, the dumping of nuclear waste into the oceans is very harmful to the environment, sea creatures and ppl living nearby... just commonsense
(20-09-2021, 03:26 PM)sgbuffett Wrote: [ -> ]It's nuclear powered sub not a nuclear weapon sub.

Nuclear power is used for electricity and even Singapore and Indonesia consider using nuclear power.

1. If US is transferring the technology to build nuclear submarines with nuclear reactors in submarines, can Aussie develop with this nuclear technology to make nuclear weapons. 

2. It is common in almost all nuclear submarines  that they carry nuclear weapon as a norm. How do you know later if nuclear weapon is installed in the submarine?

3. Can US supplies nuclear weapon to the Aussie submarines?  

4. If Russia wants to build nuclear submarine for Iran, will US oppose and on what ground can US oppose?
(20-09-2021, 03:26 PM)sgbuffett Wrote: [ -> ]It's nuclear powered sub not a nuclear weapon sub.

Nuclear power is used for electricity and even Singapore and Indonesia consider using nuclear power.

watched Taiwan talk show just now, they said these submarines are much bigger and can carry nuke heads, which is the intention of Uncle Sam.

Like that Russia can share their nuclear submarine technology with Iran, China can share their nuclear submarine technology with North Korea...WW3 will start with nukes sooner or later. What the US does violates International Nuclear Treaty.
ah butt too naive, din know how evil these ppl can be. 年少无知还是人头猪脑?
(20-09-2021, 10:57 PM)WhatDoYouThink? Wrote: [ -> ]ah butt too naive, din know how evil these ppl can be. 年少无知还是人头猪脑?

He doesn't think deep. He only read from the surface. If from USA, he accepts 100%.  

.
(21-09-2021, 09:31 AM)webinarian Wrote: [ -> ]He doesn't think deep. He only read from the surface. If from USA, he accepts 100%.  

.

he typical us and india fanboy.