19-01-2023, 03:30 PM
19-01-2023, 03:47 PM
Built a new punggol or woodlands ferry terminal.
Now at tenah merah terminal too far away.
Now at tenah merah terminal too far away.
19-01-2023, 03:48 PM
Just build a cycling or covered walk path is gd enough
19-01-2023, 03:51 PM
If both immigrations open up all booths, the current issue will be solve immediately. But where to find so many manpower? Another way is to up the current toll charges by 100%, 200% both sides.
19-01-2023, 03:51 PM
(19-01-2023, 03:47 PM)Blin Wrote: [ -> ]Built a new punggol or woodlands ferry terminal.
Now at tenah merah terminal too far away.
Punggol and woodlands too near already. Ferry journey maybe only 5 mins.

19-01-2023, 04:01 PM
(19-01-2023, 03:47 PM)Blin Wrote: [ -> ]Built a new punggol or woodlands ferry terminal.
Now at tenah merah terminal too far away.
Punggol a bit far from Puteri. Woodlands is quite near. Closest will be Lim Chu Kang but it is not the nearest possible place. Nearest possible place is forest land so unlikely to be built there.
19-01-2023, 04:05 PM
(19-01-2023, 03:30 PM)Levin Wrote: [ -> ]https://www.channelnewsasia.com/asia/mal...ur-3216486
Last time they said wanted to connect to Kukup leh!


19-01-2023, 04:10 PM
(19-01-2023, 03:30 PM)Levin Wrote: [ -> ]https://www.channelnewsasia.com/asia/mal...ur-3216486
We already have two overland access to Johor Barhu, and another rail link in 2026, why need a sea link to Johor................?


19-01-2023, 04:15 PM
(19-01-2023, 04:10 PM)debono Wrote: [ -> ]We already have two overland access to Johor Barhu, and another rail link in 2026, why need a sea link to Johor................?![]()
We already have sea links to Johor via Tanah Merah and Changi. But those are on the east side. I think Johor wants another on the west side of Singapore?