stronger anti-corruption laws not needed
it is not no evidence
it is evidence overlooked
those experts add nothing
a blatant disregard of the Laws of this Land.
meow meow smelly
"The values of Singapore's founding generation of leaders have been scrupulously adhered to by successive generations of leaders and are like "religious commandments""
- Law Minister K Shanmugan
Google all you can read about corruption...
CPIB website
Like that no need to do business already, this cannot that cannot
Thete are countries due to their limitations, you just need to use $ to facilitate, you may not like it, others also need to make a living
They need time to right the corrption, can't simply apply Singapore standard there hope everything will be hunky dory
(08-02-2023, 12:20 PM)jameslee58@hotmail.com Wrote: [ -> ]Like that no need to do business already, this cannot that cannot
Thete are countries due to their limitations, you just need to use $ to facilitate, you may not like it, others also need to make a living
They need time to right the corrption, can't simply apply Singapore standard there hope everything will be hunky dory
Should or should not have Anti Corruption Act in Singapore
All Singaporeans wanted to know is a simple answer from legal experts whether a stern warning verdict for 6 KOM corruption CEOs is sufficient ie right or wrong?
Should they be prosecuted or not?
Some of those legal experts missed the forest for the trees - no one is asking whether anti corruption act is needed to be strengthen or not?
These so-called experts only dodge the bullet
What the use of more laws if they refuse to prosecute.
This article is written to mislead and misdirect.
(08-02-2023, 07:52 PM)sgbuffett Wrote: [ -> ]What the use of more laws if they refuse to prosecute.
This article is written to mislead and misdirect.
These so-called experts are dispensable, thus, should be executed
(08-02-2023, 05:40 AM)singlon Wrote: [ -> ]those experts add nothing
a blatant disregard of the Laws of this Land.
meow meow smelly
They are helping to divert attention away and hijack to delay the process..
They are fruits from the same tree.
firstly why need to care whether sinkies commit bribery overseas or not ?
(09-02-2023, 01:37 AM)limpeh394 Wrote: [ -> ]firstly why need to care whether sinkies commit bribery overseas or not ?
Then, Singapore leaders shouldn't stop any corruption in Singapore.
Why arrest foreign bankers in 1MBD scandal?
(08-02-2023, 07:52 PM)sgbuffett Wrote: [ -> ]What the use of more laws if they refuse to prosecute.
This article is written to mislead and misdirect.
It's not that "they" whoever that is, refused to prosecute.
It's the key witnesses who refused to come to Singapore. If you cannot produce the witnesses, the case cannot proceed.
Is that too hard for you to understand? Pritam is a lawyer, go ask him to explain how the courts work, kid.
(08-02-2023, 07:22 PM)Scythian Wrote: [ -> ]All Singaporeans wanted to know is a simple answer from legal experts whether a stern warning verdict for 6 KOM corruption CEOs is sufficient ie right or wrong?
Should they be prosecuted or not?
Some of those legal experts missed the forest for the trees - no one is asking whether anti corruption act is needed to be strengthen or not?
I don't know what all sinkies need to know but I do know what you need to know is this.
If you poh mata, say a man trespassed into your house (offence lumber one) and rub your laubu's abalone until she wet wet (offence lumber two), they will take down your statement and the AG will charge the man.
But neither you nor your laobu agrees to attend court. Both of you are key witnesses. Without your attending court, the prosecution cannot prove its case. Do you follow?
need to brush up detection. especially on those government department that spend a lot of money.
like man will say to outsource need to go to certain supplier.