British not as powerful as they once were during the Falklands war
So it is hard to tell who will win in a new confrontation
BUT then UK has the backing of the big bully so the end is the same
Good
I support Argentina!
British busy supply arms to Ukraine. Argentina is smart to chut pattern now good timing. See British handle multiple fronts shiok or not
(03-03-2023, 07:55 PM)cityhantam Wrote: [ -> ]Good
I support Argentina!
Hope Argentina don’t suddenly insult CCP.
Then CCP sees this post, cityhantam and whole family can go carry rocks and sandbags in 劳改.
(03-03-2023, 08:32 PM)kelhot2001 Wrote: [ -> ]Hope Argentina don’t suddenly insult CCP.
Then CCP sees this post, cityhantam and whole family can go carry rocks and sandbags in 劳改.
Wow！
You are speaking from experience?
Your ex-China wife made you do all those works?
Still want that sheep Islands after 40 years .. Think this time UK won't like Ukraine.
(03-03-2023, 09:00 PM)ysh02 Wrote: [ -> ]Still want that sheep Islands after 40 years .. Think this time UK won't like Ukraine.
UK will send their leaking aircraft carrier there!
The Brits barely won the 1982 war against the Argentines......even with much material help from the US
That conflict made sea-skimming, anti-ship missiles like the French Am39 Exocet famous,.
![[Image: Vandenengel-PRO-12-19%202.jpg]](https://www.usni.org/sites/default/files/styles/embed_medium/public/Vandenengel-PRO-12-19%202.jpg)
Last year’s planned HMS Prince of Wales voyage to the US was hailed by the Royal Navy as a “landmark mission to shape the future of stealth jet and drone operations off the coast of North America and in the Caribbean,” before being prematurely aborted after discovery of the starboard shaft fault.
A previous US deployment was similarly cancelled after the carrier was forced to undergo a six month repair, at cost of £3.3 million ($4.07 million) after suffering an engine room internal flood.
(03-03-2023, 08:25 PM)sgh Wrote: [ -> ]British busy supply arms to Ukraine. Argentina is smart to chut pattern now good timing. See British handle multiple fronts shiok or not
They kay kiang la ... want to show they are as kilat as USA.
(03-03-2023, 09:23 PM)cityhantam Wrote: [ -> ]Last year’s planned HMS Prince of Wales voyage to the US was hailed by the Royal Navy as a “landmark mission to shape the future of stealth jet and drone operations off the coast of North America and in the Caribbean,” before being prematurely aborted after discovery of the starboard shaft fault. A previous US deployment was similarly cancelled after the carrier was forced to undergo a six month repair, at cost of £3.3 million ($4.07 million) after suffering an engine room internal flood.
I find it a bad Karma to name a modern aircraft carrier after the famous British WW2 battleship which was sunk by Japanese aerial attack in South China Sea after sailing off to defend Singapore in Dec 1941, only 2 months before Perceival surrendered colonial SG to Yamashita....
https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/.../205087093
So this time if have opportunity will take revenge and sink one energy ship or get sink by them...
UK busy supply weapons to Ukraine got time to handle Argentina? Also falklands like far from UK mainland leh. Just surrender give to Argentina lar. Then UK got full attention to whack Russia together with their crony US and other NATO countries.
The king may don't give up....40 yrs ago they risk many lives to take back , must defend it,his mother once said every inch take back...
(05-03-2023, 06:10 PM)ysh02 Wrote: [ -> ]The king may don't give up....40 yrs ago they risk many lives to take back , must defend it,his mother once said every inch take back...
Well then by all means activate UK troops to Falklands lor. But then they give some of their weapons to Ukraine already they got enough for their own? On two fronts concurrently is very taxing for UK military I would think.
This time UK tell Ukraine temporary stop arms to you: we want to defend our lands first....