SG Talk

Full Version: Reality vs Stats (CECA) As experienced by a real citizen
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.


Dear Minister Tan See Leng,

This is an open letter as a handful of citizens may be interested in the matter of  "employment disconnect"  as seen from the eyes of a real citizen. 

From your ministerial statement made on 6th July 2021, you declared:
"Today we still have about 22,000 PME jobs that are not filled. Companies are desperate to fill these jobs, and would love to take in Singaporeans if they could, because they would be more productive. So why are these jobs not filled till now?"
and
"The citizen unemployment rate over the past decade has been consistently low at around 3%".

Minister sir, then it is time for all of us to celebrate and smell the roses.......... if the above statements are true.  That SG is actually experiencing full employment status as defined by textbook economists.

However, if the Minister would take the effort to leave his Ivory tower and spend some money to support our Grab and private hirer drivers and chat with them about why they are driving instead of being driven, then the Minister would tear up his stacks of data and bin them.

You will find your trip well spent and highly educational.  Most of us speak good English.  Able to talk about social, political, and diversified matters that come with our world-class education system.  If you close your eyes, you could have sworn that you are actually speaking with a PMET.  Imagine that.  Like the CECA Indians, we the PMET drivers are everywhere!

The next question as a competent Minister of Manpower would ask " why are you driving risking your life for 8 to 12 hours a day without rest when there are 22,000 PMET jobs sitting in my office?"

Why indeed.  As a humble PMET driver, I can only postulate that it is because there is a Blockage that is stopping these jobs from being filled by SG.  This also applies to the thousands of delivery drivers, food Pandas, security officers, supervisors and those who simply give up and slip through the cracks and out of the system.  Your 3% unemployment rate would look rather untenable if you factor in the thousands that are not working in the appropriate jobs as commensurate with their experiences and educational level.  A term that MOM should start adopting in your statistics - Underemployment. 

By now, your senses must be chiming with a small alarm bell that not all is rosy at the grassroots level.  Either the vacancies data you are provided with are false, thus permitting the hordes of PRs and new citizens continued and unrestricted entry into SG or a blockage that is undermining our ability to access these 22,000 PMET jobs.  Or both. 

I, like many others, have applied repeatedly for jobs that are in line with our expertise and experiences.  Yet, over the 8 years of applications, I received less than 10 calls and 2 interviews. I assure you that I am not alone in this matter.  I assure you that it has nothing to do with lack of skills upgrading too. This is some diversionary tactic to detract us from the grim fact that our jobs are simply taken over regardless of skills, salaries, and experiences.  For many of us, this exercise is actually skills "downgrading".

As a responsible Minister, I urge you to be more proactive in this matter by:
1.  Check and confirm that there are actually 22,000 PMET jobs available.  Not just a number that has not been refreshed and gathering dust.
2.  Deploy some manpower and speak with Real people on the ground driving, delivering, guarding, cleaning, and other jobs.......why they are doing what they are doing.  Is this to keep fit, hobby, list of things to do before dying or lack of proper jobs?
3.  Include in your database, the status of "Underemployed" citizens for this group is not insignificant.  This will provide a more realistic reflection on our state of employment. 
4.  Set up a "Sting" operation to flush out why these vacancies are blocked or even "gamed" and still not filled despite your so-called best efforts.
How?
Use actual CVs of unemployed PMETs to test the usual routes to potential employers and monitor what happens with the applications.  Keep in close communication with the applicants.
If nothing happens after 1 month (no calls at all), then pay a friendly visit to the employer and enquire about the status of these unfilled jobs without giving their HR knowledge that the MOM has been monitoring the application. 

I am sure that along with the thousands of unemployed PMETs, we will be very interested in learning why these jobs remain unfilled and what gems the MOM may uncover on the proviso that you are willing to reveal them.

We, the people of our beloved red dot, are mostly not smelling roses but the pong of Titan Arum aka "smelliest flower in the world".  I urge you along with our esteemed Ministers to cast off your suits and really start looking with fresh eyes instead of burying yourselves in statistics for you are losing touch with your own people - I mean Singaporeans who have served the Army, reservists and wives and mothers that borne them.

Your humble GRAB driver,

Philip Wen
Wah this Ah Leng very jialat. Sit in ivory tower, just listen to his subordinates talk co*k and sing song to him and yet he cannot tell the differene between what is colorful stats and real world situation.


Jialat
(25-07-2021, 11:00 PM)klat Wrote: [ -> ]Wah this Ah Leng very jialat. Sit in ivory tower, just listen to his subordinates talk co*k and sing song to him and yet he cannot tell the differene between what is colorful stats and real world situation.


Jialat

This is how PAP lost Aljunied GRC and SengKang GRC.

Good luck to PAP!
If not careful, Ah Leng gonna lose big in the next erection
https://www.facebook.com/philip.wen.982/...7064593122



Philip Wen



For those who have not read my interview with our MAS in June/ July 2015.
Looking back after 6 years, my fears for our jobs and our childrens' are being realized.
You be the judge.

Sometime in June/ July 2015, I wrote this: 

A few weeks ago, I interviewed with the Monetary Authority of Singapore for a position in business development in the private banking sector.

The lady Head of FX and business development interviewed me for this role. The Head only asked one question and I knew my answer was not what she needed to hear.  I left the interview bemused and with a sense of failure. Initially, I felt depressed for this poor showing during the interview but over time, I became convinced that I was not wrong in my answer.

The question she asked was " If you are in MAS, how do you attract senior FX traders from HK specifically XYZ bank to Singapore?"

I thought that this was a trick question.  I confidently answered by informing her that I personally know of more than a handful of senior Singaporean FX traders with more than 20 years of experience that are actively looking for a job.  Most of them held senior roles in major trading banks in Singapore for many years and yet had to make way and became private FX punters or househusbands. As such, Singapore does not need to poach overseas FX traders as we have more than enough local talents to do the job well.

She was not moved. She was not convinced about our local talents in FX which is an area of expertise long dominated by Singaporeans since the1980s in Asia.  The interviewer, however, was serious about this question and she persisted in very clear terms that this was actually a real-life situation that she is trying to formulate for MAS - that MAS is actively trying to recruit senior foreign FX traders from HK to Singapore - families and all of course.

If this was an interview with a commercial bank, I would not be too concerned about this question and its implications.  However, we are referencing the Monetary Authority of Singapore.  Clearly, the ongoing government policy of trying to rehire laid-off senior local talents (PMETs) has not received the attention of our de facto central bank judging from this single question she asked of me.

This one question may have come from higher up the ladder and if so does not bode well with the rest of what our government is pitching to suffering senior Singaporeans with family to support.
Is our government simply giving us lip service just to allay our fears about our future?

In fact, I believe that with the kind of question that the interviewer from MAS was asking, we have to brace ourselves to see more foreign talents converging onto Singapore's already weak financial market.  I pity our local talents in banking as even our very own Monetary Authority believes that FX traders elsewhere are deemed better than us. 

So much for our CFMAS (Capital Markets and Financial Advisory Services) and IBF (Institute of Banking and Finance)  exams and modules that we have to take to in order to stay abreast and upgrade with the financial world.

On a footnote, I just received an official email from MAS informing me that my application was not successful. For this time, I am proud to stand my ground.
Source of the post for Reality vs Stats (CECA) As experienced by a real citizen. 

https://www.facebook.com/philip.wen.982/...0684538122
"The question she asked was " If you are in MAS, how do you attract senior FX traders from HK specifically XYZ bank to Singapore?"

I thought that this was a trick question. I confidently answered by informing her that I personally know of more than a handful of senior Singaporean FX traders with more than 20 years of experience that are actively looking for a job. Most of them held senior roles in major trading banks in Singapore for many years and yet had to make way and became private FX punters or househusbands. As such, Singapore does not need to poach overseas FX traders as we have more than enough local talents to do the job well.

She was not moved. She was not convinced about our local talents in FX which is an area of expertise long dominated by Singaporeans since the1980s in Asia. "




GOne liao lah SG
(26-07-2021, 10:15 AM)forum456 Wrote: [ -> ]Source of the post for Reality vs Stats (CECA) As experienced by a real citizen. 

https://www.facebook.com/philip.wen.982/...0684538122

CECA is signed and sealed. The PAP will never admit that CECA has any flaws. ...because if they do they have to go and renegotiate with the Indian govt....they won't do it.