SG Talk

Full Version: Article : LKY made his country very rich but something now wrong with his system...
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Read with an open mind. Nothing should be yaken for granted.


OPINION
FARAH STOCKMAN

*He Made His Country Rich, but Something Has Gone Wrong With the System*

_April 12, 2023_

"But now, eight years after the death of Lee Kuan Yew, Singapore is at a crossroads. It’s being run by his eldest son, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, who leans heavily on his father’s legacy. Elections for the largely ceremonial post of president are expected in September and parliamentary elections are due by 2025. The prime minister’s potential successor has already been picked. But the ruling People’s Action Party has never looked so vulnerable.

Critics say Singapore is becoming more like a plutocracy, in which well-paid yes men with the right connections to the Lee family rise up the ranks. Today, Singapore is a place where forklift operators can face jail time for taking one-dollar bribes but executives from the Singaporean conglomerate Keppel — who paid millions in bribes, according to the U.S. Justice Department — got off with “stern warnings.” (Officials in Singapore have said that they didn’t have enough evidence to take the case to court.)

The trouble is that the system requires someone like Lee Kuan Yew at the top — strict and charismatic, as Michael Barr, author of “Singapore: A Modern History,” told me. “But no one who has that political skill would ever rise to the top today because that person would be regarded as a threat,” he said.
Perhaps the clearest sign that something in Singapore has gone wrong is the fact that Lee Kuan Yew’s youngest son and one of his grandsons say they are now living in exile, fearful that they would be arrested if they ever returned.

“My uncle doesn’t want competing claims to legitimacy,” Lee Kuan Yew’s grandson Shengwu Li told me over a cup of tea in Cambridge, Mass. “Authoritarian systems don’t survive by taking chances. If they think there’s a 5 percent chance I’ll be a problem for them, they want that to be zero.”

The irony is that Mr. Li, a 38-year-old assistant professor of economics at Harvard who was just awarded a top honor in his field, doesn’t have political ambitions. Soft-spoken and cerebral, he says he’s happy working on his theorems in a place where nobody gives him special treatment because he’s related to Lee Kuan Yew. After 10 years studying at Oxford and Stanford, he got used to certain freedoms.

Lee Hsien Yang, Lee Kuan Yew’s youngest son, says he has been fighting to honor his father’s wish not to have a cult of personality built around the house. But he says his elder brother, the prime minister, wants to preserve the house as a national monument to bolster his own political legitimacy. Lee Hsien Yang spoke out publicly against his brother, only to get hit with an investigation. Eventually, he fled the country, like his son. It seems to be an example of what Kenneth Paul Tan, a Singaporean professor of cultural studies, calls the “politics of evermore sophisticated bullying.” At its core, the fight isn’t about a house or a will. It’s about the future of Singapore.

“The institutions in Singapore, whether it is the judiciary, the civil service, the army, the institutions of higher learning, have all gradually come under direct control in a way that stifles independent thinking and challenge,” Lee Hsien Yang told me. Lee Kuan Yew would solicit different views and occasionally change his mind, he said. “Today, the Singapore authorities no longer have people who would challenge the system to say, ‘Here’s my view. I don’t think you are doing the right thing.’ They are too well-paid.”

Lee Hsien Yang and his son Shengwu Li avoided politics for most of their lives, but since the feud over the house burst into public view, both have voiced sympathy for the political opposition, lending the legitimacy of that crucial family name. Yet their ability to help the opposition has been curtailed by the accusations against them. The episode has exposed the cracks in Singapore’s celebrated system. If Lee Kuan Yew’s son and grandson can feel compelled to flee, what can happen to ordinary people?

Political scientists weren’t sure that Singapore’s highly successful system would outlast Lee Kuan Yew. By the end of his life, even the great man himself spoke of preparing for the day when his party would lose power. That’s the thing about benevolent autocracies: They tend to expire. They either cease to be autocracies — as happened in South Korea and Chile — or they cease to be benevolent."

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/12/opini...cracy.html
Yangyang's woe is self-inflicted lah!
Countries led by "great men" rarely do well when he is gone as future leaders simply try to ride the legacy rather than do what is needed to take the country forward.
LKY do not need million dollars paycheck to run singapore when he first started

if a country need to hire million dollars paycheck ministers and politicians
it will be like putin administration
those greedy rich lawless russian oligarchy  runs the country now
(13-04-2023, 12:03 PM)sgbuffett Wrote: [ -> ]Countries led by "great men" rarely do well when he is gone as future leaders simply try to ride the legacy rather than do what is needed to take the country forward.

Mao Zedong, the great man who established People’s Republic of China has died for decades. 

The country is doing extremely well!  Clapping
The term "Plutocracy" accurately characterise Singapore society....its like money is always central yo our thinking.
"The irony is that Mr. Li, a 38-year-old assistant professor of economics..."

38 still asst prof, quite slow
(13-04-2023, 12:01 PM)sgbuffett Wrote: [ -> ]Read with an open mind. Nothing should be yaken for granted.


OPINION
FARAH STOCKMAN

*He Made His Country Rich, but Something Has Gone Wrong With the System*

_April 12, 2023_

"But now, eight years after the death of Lee Kuan Yew, Singapore is at a crossroads. It’s being run by his eldest son, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, who leans heavily on his father’s legacy. Elections for the largely ceremonial post of president are expected in September and parliamentary elections are due by 2025. The prime minister’s potential successor has already been picked. But the ruling People’s Action Party has never looked so vulnerable.

Critics say Singapore is becoming more like a plutocracy, in which well-paid yes men with the right connections to the Lee family rise up the ranks. Today, Singapore is a place where forklift operators can face jail time for taking one-dollar bribes but executives from the Singaporean conglomerate Keppel — who paid millions in bribes, according to the U.S. Justice Department — got off with “stern warnings.” (Officials in Singapore have said that they didn’t have enough evidence to take the case to court.)

The trouble is that the system requires someone like Lee Kuan Yew at the top — strict and charismatic, as Michael Barr, author of “Singapore: A Modern History,” told me. “But no one who has that political skill would ever rise to the top today because that person would be regarded as a threat,” he said.
Perhaps the clearest sign that something in Singapore has gone wrong is the fact that Lee Kuan Yew’s youngest son and one of his grandsons say they are now living in exile, fearful that they would be arrested if they ever returned.

“My uncle doesn’t want competing claims to legitimacy,” Lee Kuan Yew’s grandson Shengwu Li told me over a cup of tea in Cambridge, Mass. “Authoritarian systems don’t survive by taking chances. If they think there’s a 5 percent chance I’ll be a problem for them, they want that to be zero.”

The irony is that Mr. Li, a 38-year-old assistant professor of economics at Harvard who was just awarded a top honor in his field, doesn’t have political ambitions. Soft-spoken and cerebral, he says he’s happy working on his theorems in a place where nobody gives him special treatment because he’s related to Lee Kuan Yew. After 10 years studying at Oxford and Stanford, he got used to certain freedoms.

Lee Hsien Yang, Lee Kuan Yew’s youngest son, says he has been fighting to honor his father’s wish not to have a cult of personality built around the house. But he says his elder brother, the prime minister, wants to preserve the house as a national monument to bolster his own political legitimacy. Lee Hsien Yang spoke out publicly against his brother, only to get hit with an investigation. Eventually, he fled the country, like his son. It seems to be an example of what Kenneth Paul Tan, a Singaporean professor of cultural studies, calls the “politics of evermore sophisticated bullying.” At its core, the fight isn’t about a house or a will. It’s about the future of Singapore.

“The institutions in Singapore, whether it is the judiciary, the civil service, the army, the institutions of higher learning, have all gradually come under direct control in a way that stifles independent thinking and challenge,” Lee Hsien Yang told me. Lee Kuan Yew would solicit different views and occasionally change his mind, he said. “Today, the Singapore authorities no longer have people who would challenge the system to say, ‘Here’s my view. I don’t think you are doing the right thing.’ They are too well-paid.”

Lee Hsien Yang and his son Shengwu Li avoided politics for most of their lives, but since the feud over the house burst into public view, both have voiced sympathy for the political opposition, lending the legitimacy of that crucial family name. Yet their ability to help the opposition has been curtailed by the accusations against them. The episode has exposed the cracks in Singapore’s celebrated system. If Lee Kuan Yew’s son and grandson can feel compelled to flee, what can happen to ordinary people?

Political scientists weren’t sure that Singapore’s highly successful system would outlast Lee Kuan Yew. By the end of his life, even the great man himself spoke of preparing for the day when his party would lose power. That’s the thing about benevolent autocracies: They tend to expire. They either cease to be autocracies — as happened in South Korea and Chile — or they cease to be benevolent."

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/12/opini...cracy.html

now the ministers Rich. hahaha
(13-04-2023, 12:13 PM)sgbuffett Wrote: [ -> ]The term "Plutocracy" accurately characterise Singapore society....its like money is always central yo our thinking.

one party system is always  grew  greedy 

look at putin system..... one party attack ukraine and crimea
look at chinese one party system....   attacked tibet, grab south china sea for themselves and intimidating taiwan
look at hitler nazi.... also attack it neigbours

one party greedy system in the past and present it the same and end up worst as it progress
Never mind since 61% love a rich Govt

but poor beings in SG like Jac Lau

even his bank account is miserable
singapore one party system is a very bad system in a long run


most one party system that resemble singapore one party system end up bad like putin russia, mao china, gadaffi Libia etc etc
(13-04-2023, 12:20 PM)grotesqueness Wrote: [ -> ]one party system is always  grew  greedy 

look at putin system..... one party attack ukraine and crimea
look at chinese one party system....   attacked tibet, grab south china sea for themselves and intimidating taiwan
look at hitler nazi.... also attack it neigbours

one party greedy system in the past and present it the same and end up worst as it progress

Tibet Taiwan is part of China Clapping
(13-04-2023, 12:33 PM)FartSunKing Wrote: [ -> ]If sgbuffett and ola

Born in India

And came to Singapore to work and live

They both will have a better life

Because they will not be ingrates

With a Singaputra entitlement mentality

Who think PAP is their mama's tits

Always there to feed them

Because they were born Singaporean

u shut up and get lost to hinterland

u are a thief here
(13-04-2023, 12:35 PM)Niubee Wrote: [ -> ]Tibet Taiwan is part of China  Clapping

one party system always claim "this is part them"

like russia on ukraine and crimea 
and china on South China Sea

always claim this is part of them

but they never claim those  smelly sai and jiao is part of them too
[Image: HYUXRNw.gif]
How many got the luxury of studying 10 years in Ivy League... Such good life...
Jac Lau is happy to be a Slave of PAP

to pay his annual income tax to feed the 5 Useless Mayors

and call it Nation Building



Clapping





[Image: Show-income-tax.png]
I am so happy that there are 61% Naive like Jac Lau who wants to fatten PAP

while he eats lousy dirty food

and cannot even afford to buy a condo at his age



[Image: 5-meal-tk-u-PA-P.png]
(13-04-2023, 12:15 PM)WhatDoYouThink! Wrote: [ -> ]"The irony is that Mr. Li, a 38-year-old assistant professor of economics..."

38 still asst prof, quite slow

Aiya...it depends on which uni. Full professor at SUSS versus assistant professor at Harvard, which job will you prefer. Besides, sinkie males have to waste 2 years, hence slower progression than others.
(13-04-2023, 12:39 PM)Talent Wrote: [ -> ]u shut up and get lost to hinterland

u are a thief here



Jac Lau came from Malaysia as a Robber

Yet he thinks he should be entitled like citizens here

sucking our country dry like Parasite

*he deleted his own comments like a Coward again??
I feel there is something very wrong. The citizens lack passion to do real work. They just do for the sake of acting, once nobody is watching they drop what they are working on. If they do not meet the target, the change the goal poles. They will not hesitate to lie to others or themselves just to meet their "targets".
(13-04-2023, 06:34 PM)dynamite Wrote: [ -> ]I feel there is something very wrong. The citizens lack passion to do real work. They just do for the sake of acting, once nobody is watching they drop what they are working on. If they do not meet the target, the change the goal poles. They will not hesitate to lie to others or themselves just to meet their "targets".

dont have brains like those steve job, bill gates, elon musk etc.... to make company big again

dont blame the workers with no goals and not doing real jobs  lahhhhhhhhhhhhh




[Image: TQEWhN.gif]
[Image: 2383-BA35-0-B33-4146-8439-A45-CFDE4-F378.jpg]
(13-04-2023, 06:34 PM)dynamite Wrote: [ -> ]I feel there is something very wrong. The citizens lack passion to do real work. They just do for the sake of acting, once nobody is watching they drop what they are working on. If they do not meet the target, the change the goal poles. They will not hesitate to lie to others or themselves just to meet their "targets".

Top like to wayang so bottom also wayang.

Number one priority in civil service is cover backside. Nothing is more important than that. So everyone does stupid things, as long as he follows the rules.
(13-04-2023, 09:25 PM)Blasterlord2 Wrote: [ -> ]Top like to wayang so bottom also wayang.

Number one priority in civil service is cover backside. Nothing is more important than that. So everyone does stupid things, as long as he follows the rules.

I feel the top lack passion and never lead by example. 

The below case is the type of passion, justice and perseverance needed in our society.

https://youtu.be/c8xdefyK3zc
(13-04-2023, 09:38 PM)dynamite Wrote: [ -> ]I feel the top lack passion and never lead by example. 

The below case is the type of passion, justice and perseverance needed in our society.

https://youtu.be/c8xdefyK3zc

Because passion never really brings money, and ours is a money-faced society. Everyone is judged and treated according to how much money they have, not on how good they are doing a job.