SG Talk

Full Version: Ridout : There is a kind of shamelessnrss when PAP go after critics and opposition..
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
I remember during one of the hearings on POFMA Minister Shanmugam tried to grill historian Thum Ping Tjin over some of his research to accuse him of being a  bias historian. The whole session was 6 hours 

https://www.straitstimes.com/politics/sh...-historian

After that POFMA was implemented and so far has only been used against opposition, PAP critics and on articles unfavorable to the PAP.  He was trying to accuse a respected historian of being bias yet a lot of what he does is hardly objective.

Of course he spoke often of the seriousness of inequality in our society yet he lives in a palatial home with land space larger than that of Chiangi Jewel . He claims he has not done anything wrong. But it looks so wrong at a time Singaporeans are struggling with high cost of housing and can't even get a BTO roughly the size of his car park.

He went after critics of the govt immigration policies often portraying them as xenophobic racists  lots of time was spent in Parliament "going after" Leong Mun Wai jnstead of debating the impact of these polices. His tactic of going after people instead of debating issues - does not endear him to many of us.

But all of us should not behave the same way as Shanmugan because we are not shameless. I urge everyone to give him a chance to explain clearly so that even primary school students can understand and stop making accusations against him. We should not stoop so low because we should view all this objectively.

Did someone fling and throw file this time round?
History have shown, karma is real.
Pofma is fake.
(25-05-2023, 11:42 AM)Alice Alicia Wrote: [ -> ]History have shown, karma is real.
Pofma is fake.

The double standards, hypocrisy and shameless behavior is unbecoming of leadership