(13-07-2023, 10:07 PM)Oyk Wrote: [ -> ]You don't prove to be smart with that flippant question. If you cannot talk reasonably and want to play with words, then Oyk tells you to fugg off. 
This is the real Schroeder when he loses
Good money machine for the Gov.They know ppl are daft... .😅
(13-07-2023, 10:01 PM)Oyk Wrote: [ -> ]For every success story like Hotel 81 and Sheng Siong, there are 10,000 startups which came to grief.
Business acumen is not something which everyone has. For this reason, the vast majority of people study and hope to enter a university but those who are not academically inclined may learn a skill. Both work for peepur.
Working for peepur and getting a salary is a choice. Nobody forced you to work for others. Your can go into business and work for yourself right. But most peepur will say no, it's better to work for peepur because doing business is too risky.
He who takes the risk takes the rewards. So I wonder what you are on about ranting about inequality. 
I did not rant about inequality. I only advocate for a society where income gaps are not so wide. In reality, many people are rich because they owe it to others. You should read this.
https://jacobin.com/2023/05/wealth-inequ...rstructure
If it works, half the world would have adopted it.
(13-07-2023, 11:10 PM)Blasterlord2 Wrote: [ -> ]I did not rant about inequality. I only advocate for a society where income gaps are not so wide. In reality, many people are rich because they owe it to others. You should read this.
https://jacobin.com/2023/05/wealth-inequ...rstructure
Learn to think for yourself, and not be led by the nose by other peepur's views or writing.
If you compare Ong Beng Seng with someone living in a one room HDB flat, the Gini Coeff is as sure as hell very big. But the majority of Singaporeans are actually middle to upper middle classed. Statistically, you look at the median and not the spread in the range. I HOPE you understand what I am saying here.
So your ranting about inequality is just hogwash.

(14-07-2023, 09:26 AM)Oyk Wrote: [ -> ]Learn to think for yourself, and not be led by the nose by other peepur's views or writing.
If you compare Ong Beng Seng with someone living in a one room HDB flat, the Gini Coeff is as sure as hell very big. But the majority of Singaporeans are actually middle to upper middle classed. Statistically, you look at the median and not the spread in the range. I HOPE you understand what I am saying here.
So your ranting about inequality is just hogwash. 
Dun be a cock and think that I'm following others. I've all along had this same opinion. Now, can you fark off?
(14-07-2023, 10:00 AM)Blasterlord2 Wrote: [ -> ]Dun be a cock and think that I'm following others. I've all along had this same opinion. Now, can you fark off?
And this too shalt passeth.
Right,

Some people say without coe, car numbers will be much more. Meaning Coe works. What is your comments??
Quote:Fran Drescher has blasted Hollywood studios in a fiery speech after talks between the actors’ union and studios failed to avert a strike, calling them “disgusting” for claiming “they’re losing money left and right when giving hundreds of millions of dollars to their CEOs”.
This is how CEOs exploit workers telling them the companies are losing money while they pay themselves millions. Similar to how wall street bankers asked the govt to bail them out with many workers being retrenched and they continue to earn millions. Meritocracy is over-rated.
https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2023...ywood-ceos