+- SG Talk (https://sgtalk.net)
+-- Forum: SG Talk (https://sgtalk.net/Forum-SG-Talk)
+--- Forum: Market Talk (https://sgtalk.net/Forum-Market-Talk)
+--- Thread: Netizens dispute ‘voluntary’ claim over Bukit Canberra hawkers’ binding (/Thread-Netizens-dispute-%E2%80%98voluntary%E2%80%99-claim-over-Bukit-Canberra-hawkers%E2%80%99-binding)
Netizens dispute ‘voluntary’ claim over Bukit Canberra hawkers’ binding - Bigiron - 15-08-2025
Netizens dispute ‘voluntary’ claim over Bukit Canberra hawkers’ binding free meals clause
Despite Minister Ong Ye Kung and operator Canopy Hawkers Group’s defence, legal experts say Bukit Canberra hawkers are contractually bound to provide free meals. Netizens criticised “double talk” over claims of voluntariness, arguing the charity burden should not fall on stallholders already facing financial strain.
https://www.theonlinecitizen.com/2025/08/15/netizens-dispute-voluntary-claim-over-bukit-canberra-hawkers-binding-free-meals-clause/
RE: Netizens dispute ‘voluntary’ claim over Bukit Canberra hawkers’ binding - Geneco - 15-08-2025
need some advice who ish SURE notch happy about this lololololol...
RE: Netizens dispute ‘voluntary’ claim over Bukit Canberra hawkers’ binding - WhatDoYouThink! - 16-08-2025
Not right to include those terms in the contract, and aso not right to disagree after signing the contract. So both parties are in the wrong. So what's the problem now?
RE: Netizens dispute ‘voluntary’ claim over Bukit Canberra hawkers’ binding - Ola - 16-08-2025
Hawkers need a job and forced to sign the Contract
The problem is the Hawker Operator Tee Tree Investments
making temp cupboard storage into permanent charges
and reminding the hawkers, lor
https://teetreeinvestments.com/our-brands/