SG Talk
so indirectly MAS caused many 1000s crypto holders lose money - Printable Version

+- SG Talk (https://sgtalk.net)
+-- Forum: SG Talk (https://sgtalk.net/Forum-SG-Talk)
+--- Forum: Market Talk (https://sgtalk.net/Forum-Market-Talk)
+--- Thread: so indirectly MAS caused many 1000s crypto holders lose money (/Thread-so-indirectly-MAS-caused-many-1000s-crypto-holders-lose-money)



so indirectly MAS caused many 1000s crypto holders lose money - talky - 18-11-2022

mas banned binfinace but deposit into ftx is ok.
no wonder so many cried not becos of their fault


RE: so indirectly MAS caused many 1000s crypto holders lose money - Sline - 18-11-2022

No worry. If these cryto holders can play the highly speculative, they must be rich and can afford to lose.


RE: so indirectly MAS caused many 1000s crypto holders lose money - IndianChief - 18-11-2022

Too many red flags

Ban binance but never ban FTX which is temasek invested which would have made people shifted their money to temasek

But of course MAS can always counter argue that they never endorse FTX


RE: so indirectly MAS caused many 1000s crypto holders lose money - Talent - 18-11-2022

follow the blind


RE: so indirectly MAS caused many 1000s crypto holders lose money - debono - 18-11-2022

(18-11-2022, 12:54 PM)IndianChief Wrote:  Too many red flags

Ban binance but never ban FTX which is temasek invested which would have made people shifted their money to temasek

But of course MAS can always counter argue that they never endorse FTX
Cannot anyhow follow blindly, must make due diligence........ crying


RE: so indirectly MAS caused many 1000s crypto holders lose money - A2Z - 18-11-2022

What due diligence did Mas made to give FTX and not to Binance?


RE: so indirectly MAS caused many 1000s crypto holders lose money - Newbie - 18-11-2022

The most highly-paid and intelligent pple in Temsick also could not sniff out lack of governance in FTX. Not able to sit on the Board is one thing but not following-up on how the fund-flows and audits (maybe also manipulated) are another. Even though 1% but US275M is not small change. Some heads in Temsick should explain the fiasco in compliance.