1. SG Talk
  2. SG Talk
  3. Market Talk



Linear Mode
Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees
starbugs

Supreme Guru
Reputation: 44
*******

 Posts: 4,597     Threads: 98     
Likes Received: 1,313 in 1,040 posts
Likes Given: 286
#13

06-02-2023, 04:19 PM
Nowadays when everything has an electronic trail, it is incredible that there is no evidence in emails, messages and banking transactions. Did KOM folks use pigeons or coughing sounds to communicate on how much bribe to give and then carry stacks of cash in briefcases?
[+] 4 users Like starbugs's post
Find
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »


Messages In This Thread
Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by forum456 - 06-02-2023, 03:21 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by [[ForeverAlone]] - 06-02-2023, 03:23 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by Notdumb - 06-02-2023, 03:30 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by Scythian - 06-02-2023, 03:31 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by Instinct - 06-02-2023, 05:07 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by debono - 06-02-2023, 05:10 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by Scythian - 06-02-2023, 05:13 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by debono - 06-02-2023, 05:16 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by Scythian - 06-02-2023, 05:19 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by debono - 06-02-2023, 06:02 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by Scythian - 06-02-2023, 05:15 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by Gstalk - 06-02-2023, 06:01 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by revealer - 06-02-2023, 10:10 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by debono - 06-02-2023, 10:13 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by Gstalk - 06-02-2023, 10:29 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by RiseofAsia - 06-02-2023, 03:47 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by Reddishday - 06-02-2023, 03:49 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by menghuii - 06-02-2023, 03:55 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by menghuii - 06-02-2023, 03:58 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by Harry Lee - 06-02-2023, 04:01 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by debono - 06-02-2023, 04:13 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by Scythian - 06-02-2023, 04:02 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by grotesqueness - 06-02-2023, 04:11 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by starbugs - 06-02-2023, 04:19 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by debono - 06-02-2023, 04:32 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by kc172021 - 06-02-2023, 05:58 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by Scythian - 06-02-2023, 04:32 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by kc172021 - 06-02-2023, 06:02 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by Gstalk - 06-02-2023, 06:04 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by debono - 06-02-2023, 06:37 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by debono - 06-02-2023, 06:05 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by Scythian - 06-02-2023, 06:46 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by debono - 06-02-2023, 06:48 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by grotesqueness - 06-02-2023, 06:50 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by debono - 06-02-2023, 06:52 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by grotesqueness - 06-02-2023, 06:55 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by debono - 06-02-2023, 09:42 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by sgbuffett - 06-02-2023, 06:55 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by Scythian - 06-02-2023, 07:00 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by Manthink - 06-02-2023, 04:32 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by debono - 06-02-2023, 04:43 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by [[ForeverAlone]] - 06-02-2023, 04:41 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by Scythian - 06-02-2023, 04:44 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by debono - 06-02-2023, 04:47 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by grotesqueness - 06-02-2023, 04:46 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by Scythian - 06-02-2023, 05:05 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by Rainforest - 06-02-2023, 06:02 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by grotesqueness - 06-02-2023, 06:06 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by Ola - 06-02-2023, 06:13 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by grotesqueness - 06-02-2023, 06:46 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by Instinct - 06-02-2023, 07:08 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by sclim - 06-02-2023, 06:49 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by sgbuffett - 06-02-2023, 06:52 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by Bigiron - 06-02-2023, 09:44 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by pinkpanther - 06-02-2023, 09:53 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by debono - 06-02-2023, 10:05 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by singlon - 06-02-2023, 10:40 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by singlon - 06-02-2023, 10:49 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by singlon - 06-02-2023, 10:51 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by singlon - 06-02-2023, 10:52 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by singlon - 06-02-2023, 10:56 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by singlon - 06-02-2023, 11:04 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by lioncityftw - 06-02-2023, 11:27 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by [[ForeverAlone]] - 06-02-2023, 11:32 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by Scythian - 07-02-2023, 01:32 AM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by grotesqueness - 07-02-2023, 01:36 AM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by singlon - 06-02-2023, 11:51 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by Bluebull - 07-02-2023, 12:20 AM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by Bluebull - 07-02-2023, 12:21 AM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by Bluebull - 07-02-2023, 12:23 AM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by forum456 - 07-02-2023, 12:26 AM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by grotesqueness - 07-02-2023, 01:40 AM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by Bigiron - 19-02-2023, 09:51 PM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by Scythian - 20-02-2023, 06:53 AM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by Scythian - 20-02-2023, 07:03 AM
RE: Keppel corruption case: ‘Lack of sufficient evidence’ to prosecute 6 ex-employees - by Scythian - 20-02-2023, 06:43 AM
How 6 unscrupulous KOM CEOs outsmarted CPIB to avoid criminal prosecution - by Scythian - 07-02-2023, 01:52 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:

  1. SG Talk
  2. SG Talk
  3. Market Talk