PAP attempt to demolish WP leadership.lacks credibility..
#1
Star 

1. They form a panel of largely PAP members to pass judgement on WP members. This is a conflict of unterests and not a fair process.

2. According to Pitram Singh, they excluded evidence that proved his innocence. On what basis is evidence selectively excluded.

3. Sylvia Lim said her handwritten notes were used as evidence were misinterpreted. Why was she not consulted on the meaning of notes and how can notes be used without clarification as key evidence that holds up the entire conclusion.

4.  The recommendation now goes to the AG. The AG who was PM Lee's personal lawyer ....yes  I am.also shocked when I heard this.

We the citizens are expected to accept all this lapses and a process filled with interest conflicts to remove representatives elected by the people?

What they are doing is wrong.

I, being poor, have only my dreams; I have spread my dreams under your feet; Tread softly because you tread on my dreams.
[+] 3 users Like sgbuffett's post
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)