![](https://i.imgur.com/CLvY2jA.png")
27-01-2025, 07:31 AM
https://youtu.be/WUmdewotV-c?si=anr1IC0wD7_LMckX
Timestamped Microexpression Breakdown
Lip Compression (Slight pursing, tightens, or presses lips together):
0:00 - 0:06 (Slight pursing, generally measured approach, possibly thoughtful)
0:14 - 0:21 (slight compressions while mentioning ministers)
1:03 - 1:12 (A couple of instances while making a statement)
1:27-1:37 (Slight lip compression as he speaks of the tasks PM Lee set up)
Eye Darting (Quick, sudden eye movement to the side or down):
0:14 - 0:21 (small darting while mentioning the ministers)
0:41 - 0:47 (Darting sideways when reading names)
1:27-1:37 (Eye darting while talking about possible wrong doing of ministers)
2:36-2:41 (Eyes dart down as he is making a statement)
Tongue Juts/Protrusions (Brief, often subtle extension of the tongue):
Tongue Juts:
0:32-0:33: Slight tongue jut as he says "and written questions".
1:55-1:56: slight tongue jut as he says 'to review the matter'.
Nasal Flare:
1:17 - 1:23: There's a brief but noticeable nasal flare, along with a slight lip compression, as he speaks of the tasking that PM Lee had initiated.
Interpretation:
Subtle Moment: Tongue juts are very quick and often subtle movements that may be easily missed.
Underlying tension: Tongue jutting is an expression of subtle unease, discomfort or an unexpressed thought.
Hedging Statements: Instances and Analysis
Hedging language is when a person uses qualifiers, uncertainty, and indecision to soften or weaken a statement. It doesn't necessarily mean they are being dishonest but rather indicates that they may be avoiding being definitive.
"It May Not Be Necessary" (1:07-1:12):
Context: While explaining that the ministers will address many of the questions and seek further clarifications if necessary, he says "it may not be necessary for them to proceed with the PQ for future sittings".
Analysis: This is a classic hedging statement, using "may not" instead of a direct "it will not". This softens the implication that they will be fully satisfied.
"If Their Queries Be Sufficiently Addressed" (1:04-1:08):
Context: While saying that they can further seek clarifications if necessary, he says, "and should their queries be sufficiently addressed, it may not be necessary for them to proceed with their PQs."
Analysis: The use of the conditional "if" and "sufficiently" introduces an element of subjective judgment, making the statement less definitive. The terms of sufficient address are unclear.
"To Investigate And Determine If There Was Any Corruption or Criminal Wrongdoing" (1:25 -1:27)
Context: While talking about PM Lee's tasking of CPIB, he says "to investigate and determine if there was any corruption or criminal wrong doing".
Analysis: Using "if" shows that they did not know whether such acts happened. This can show an attempt at neutrality and objectivity.
"That is Independent of the Ministries and Agencies that They Oversee" (1:44-1:48)
Context: He is talking about the review that he did and claims that it is independent.
Analysis: He used the word independent and tried to assure that it was independent. This can show that they are aware that they are not impartial and are trying to assure this.
"which I should emphasize, relies on CPIB's findings and report" (2:30-2:36)
Context: When he says that he is going to be summarising from his review.
Analysis: It shows that he is not making his own conclusions but just summarising what is already reported by CPIB.
Inconsistent Statements: Analysis
Inconsistent statements refer to parts of the speech that may contradict each other, indicating either oversight or an attempt to present conflicting points in a specific manner.
Conflicting Claims Regarding Rents (2:36, 2:41 & 2:50 - 2:53):
Context: He states that SLA is in charge of the renting of the properties, but later implies that the ministers were in charge of it. He also mentions that the price of the two properties were at market value, but later says they had to add some additional expenses to the rent.
Analysis: These contradict each other as it shows that SLA did not take charge of the matter and rather the ministers did or made sure that the rent was at a certain level. Also by using the term 'market value' implies that this is the natural value and that it was not influenced by the ministers.
Contradiction of 'no preferential treatment' with later facts (1:27- 1:30 & 3:22-4:16):
Context: He states that the CPIB found "no preferential treatment" given to the ministers, then goes on to describe all the steps taken to appease the ministers and make their rental easier, such as clearing the land and making other adjustments.
Analysis: This is contradictory as by his own facts they were getting preferential treatment by the SLA.
Overall Analysis of Hedging & Inconsistency
Strategic Ambiguity: Mr. Teo's hedging statements can also be a strategic way of talking about a complex issue by avoiding being pinned down to definite answers, whilst conveying information to parliament.
Apparent Contradictions: The inconsistencies show that he is perhaps trying to balance different points of view and create a certain narrative.
Implications: They reveal how the information is being framed, while subtly raising certain questions about the independence and control of the processes involved.
Conclusion
Teo Chee Hean's speech analysis reveals potential indicators of nervousness, careful message management, and lack of clarity. Micro-expressions, such as lip compression, eye darting, and nasal flare, suggest underlying emotional states. His speech patterns, including hedging statements, inconsistencies, and contradictions, imply a need for further scrutiny. Additionally, his dry lip may indicate stress or discomfort. Overall, Teo Chee Hean's behavior and communication style warrant closer examination to understand the underlying motivations and implications of his words.
Timestamped Microexpression Breakdown
Lip Compression (Slight pursing, tightens, or presses lips together):
0:00 - 0:06 (Slight pursing, generally measured approach, possibly thoughtful)
0:14 - 0:21 (slight compressions while mentioning ministers)
1:03 - 1:12 (A couple of instances while making a statement)
1:27-1:37 (Slight lip compression as he speaks of the tasks PM Lee set up)
Eye Darting (Quick, sudden eye movement to the side or down):
0:14 - 0:21 (small darting while mentioning the ministers)
0:41 - 0:47 (Darting sideways when reading names)
1:27-1:37 (Eye darting while talking about possible wrong doing of ministers)
2:36-2:41 (Eyes dart down as he is making a statement)
Tongue Juts/Protrusions (Brief, often subtle extension of the tongue):
Tongue Juts:
0:32-0:33: Slight tongue jut as he says "and written questions".
1:55-1:56: slight tongue jut as he says 'to review the matter'.
Nasal Flare:
1:17 - 1:23: There's a brief but noticeable nasal flare, along with a slight lip compression, as he speaks of the tasking that PM Lee had initiated.
Interpretation:
Subtle Moment: Tongue juts are very quick and often subtle movements that may be easily missed.
Underlying tension: Tongue jutting is an expression of subtle unease, discomfort or an unexpressed thought.
Hedging Statements: Instances and Analysis
Hedging language is when a person uses qualifiers, uncertainty, and indecision to soften or weaken a statement. It doesn't necessarily mean they are being dishonest but rather indicates that they may be avoiding being definitive.
"It May Not Be Necessary" (1:07-1:12):
Context: While explaining that the ministers will address many of the questions and seek further clarifications if necessary, he says "it may not be necessary for them to proceed with the PQ for future sittings".
Analysis: This is a classic hedging statement, using "may not" instead of a direct "it will not". This softens the implication that they will be fully satisfied.
"If Their Queries Be Sufficiently Addressed" (1:04-1:08):
Context: While saying that they can further seek clarifications if necessary, he says, "and should their queries be sufficiently addressed, it may not be necessary for them to proceed with their PQs."
Analysis: The use of the conditional "if" and "sufficiently" introduces an element of subjective judgment, making the statement less definitive. The terms of sufficient address are unclear.
"To Investigate And Determine If There Was Any Corruption or Criminal Wrongdoing" (1:25 -1:27)
Context: While talking about PM Lee's tasking of CPIB, he says "to investigate and determine if there was any corruption or criminal wrong doing".
Analysis: Using "if" shows that they did not know whether such acts happened. This can show an attempt at neutrality and objectivity.
"That is Independent of the Ministries and Agencies that They Oversee" (1:44-1:48)
Context: He is talking about the review that he did and claims that it is independent.
Analysis: He used the word independent and tried to assure that it was independent. This can show that they are aware that they are not impartial and are trying to assure this.
"which I should emphasize, relies on CPIB's findings and report" (2:30-2:36)
Context: When he says that he is going to be summarising from his review.
Analysis: It shows that he is not making his own conclusions but just summarising what is already reported by CPIB.
Inconsistent Statements: Analysis
Inconsistent statements refer to parts of the speech that may contradict each other, indicating either oversight or an attempt to present conflicting points in a specific manner.
Conflicting Claims Regarding Rents (2:36, 2:41 & 2:50 - 2:53):
Context: He states that SLA is in charge of the renting of the properties, but later implies that the ministers were in charge of it. He also mentions that the price of the two properties were at market value, but later says they had to add some additional expenses to the rent.
Analysis: These contradict each other as it shows that SLA did not take charge of the matter and rather the ministers did or made sure that the rent was at a certain level. Also by using the term 'market value' implies that this is the natural value and that it was not influenced by the ministers.
Contradiction of 'no preferential treatment' with later facts (1:27- 1:30 & 3:22-4:16):
Context: He states that the CPIB found "no preferential treatment" given to the ministers, then goes on to describe all the steps taken to appease the ministers and make their rental easier, such as clearing the land and making other adjustments.
Analysis: This is contradictory as by his own facts they were getting preferential treatment by the SLA.
Overall Analysis of Hedging & Inconsistency
Strategic Ambiguity: Mr. Teo's hedging statements can also be a strategic way of talking about a complex issue by avoiding being pinned down to definite answers, whilst conveying information to parliament.
Apparent Contradictions: The inconsistencies show that he is perhaps trying to balance different points of view and create a certain narrative.
Implications: They reveal how the information is being framed, while subtly raising certain questions about the independence and control of the processes involved.
Conclusion
Teo Chee Hean's speech analysis reveals potential indicators of nervousness, careful message management, and lack of clarity. Micro-expressions, such as lip compression, eye darting, and nasal flare, suggest underlying emotional states. His speech patterns, including hedging statements, inconsistencies, and contradictions, imply a need for further scrutiny. Additionally, his dry lip may indicate stress or discomfort. Overall, Teo Chee Hean's behavior and communication style warrant closer examination to understand the underlying motivations and implications of his words.
