[sgbuffett]

By your not supporting government's action against him is indirectly supporting him already. In other words you allow him spew rubbish which could influence his followers and those who read his craps but you dun allow or against authorities to stop him from continuing his dangerous expressions. Now he had gone to US and advanced into Pedo by expressions first and eventually into bare bone stuff.........

I did not allow him to spew rubbish. YouTube did  I support other actions that can be taken removal of YouTube account and videos. Counseling and appropriate punishment. These would be more effective and less damaging to Singapore reputation. Amos is free to talk without access to technology to spread and incite.

Now you twist yo say I "indirectly support" him. This is like saying people support cruelty to animals because they eat chicken.