Australia concerned at Chinese fighter jet interception in SCS
#1

https://sg.news.yahoo.com/australia-conc...27118.html
[+] 1 user Likes lvlrsSTI's post
Reply
#2

They mean they can fly in international airspace and China cannot?
[+] 2 users Like Migrant's post
Reply
#3

No need talk reason. Fly near Australia.

Aircraft carrier landing outside Australia... Best!!!


Smile
Reply
#4

Australia is so far away!

Are they treating SCS as their territory or backyard?

Why Aussies are so kaypo?
Reply
#5

(05-06-2022, 04:06 PM)Niubee Wrote:  No need talk reason. Fly near Australia.

Aircraft carrier landing outside Australia... Best!!!

Last time two Chinese battleships docked at Sydney harbour as invited by Australian garment, Aussie media got very shocked and worried, they thought China is invading Australia. Rotfl
Reply
#6


真够爽的!中国空军歼16战机发射”铝制箔条干扰弹”攻击闯入南海的澳大利亚P-8A反潜侦察机!箔条卷进澳军军机发动机出现故障,再次险些坠机!中国人必须要硬对待爱犯贱的盎撒,绝不能退让,它们只吃硬不吃软!
.
.
[+] 1 user Likes cityhantam's post
Reply
#7

Fxxking Anglo Saxons!
Reply
#8

(05-06-2022, 08:15 PM)CHAOS Wrote:  Fxxking Anglo Saxons!

Should add convicts at end of statement. Big Grin
Reply
#9

The Chinese J-16 drew alongside the Australian P-8 while it was on a routine surveillance mission in international airspace last month before releasing flares and chaff that entered at least one of the Australian aircraft's engines, Australian Defense Minister Richard Marles said.

Military planes usually release chaff -- typically tiny strips of aluminum or zinc -- as a deliberate countermeasure to confuse missiles, but can also use it to sabotage pursuing aircraft.

"The J-16 aircraft flew very close to the side of the P-8 ... in flying close to the side, it released flares," Marles told Australia's 9News in an televised interview.

"The J-16 then accelerated and cut across the nose of the P-8, settling in front of the P-8 at a very close distance.

"At that moment it then released a bundle of chaff, which contains small pieces of aluminum, some of which were ingested into the engine of the P-8 aircraft. Quite obviously, this is very dangerous," Marles said.

When ingested, chaff can damage a jet engine's blades and in extreme instances can even shut it down, said Peter Layton, a former Australian Air Force officer who is now a fellow at the Griffith Asia Institute.

While the P-8 can operate on only one of its two engines, the alleged incident would have forced it to return to base, effectively ending its patrol, Layton said.

[Image: D76-F342-C-05-DC-4605-8-ADA-0-DBC93-ADDD42.jpg]
Reply
#10

China gave them a present.
Reply
#11

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202206/1267345.shtml

Hyping PLA’s ‘dangerous intercept,’ who is Australia performing to again? 

Australian Department of Defense made a statement on Sunday, saying that "on 26 May 2022, an RAAF [Royal Australian Air Force] P-8 maritime surveillance aircraft was intercepted by a Chinese J-16 fighter aircraft during a routine maritime surveillance activity in international airspace in the South China Sea region." It continues that "The intercept [by the Chinese fighter aircraft] resulted in a dangerous maneuver which posed a safety threat to the P-8 aircraft and its crew." Australian Deputy Prime Minister and the Minister of Defense Richard Marles said the Chinese aircraft flew very close in front of the Australian jet and released a "bundle of chaff" containing small pieces of aluminum that were ingested into the Australian aircraft's engine. He noted, "Quite obviously this is very dangerous."

Obviously, some pivotal details have been deliberately concealed by Australia. For example, where exactly in the South China Sea is the area in which the incident occurred? How far is it from the Chinese islands and reefs in the region? What is their purpose here? Furthermore, what did the Australian military aircraft do before the intercept? How far was the Australian jet from the Chinese aircraft at that time? Why didn't Australia take the initiative to announce it? The Australian military has repeatedly groundlessly accused the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) of  conducting "unsafe and unprofessional" operations, but why does it always come as loud and urgent but with little evidence?

Of course, they will not say these crucial details, nor can they.


.
.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)