[Bigiron]

PM Wong’s fear of losing ministers raises questions on PAP’s leadership depth and resilience 

Prime Minister Lawrence Wong’s Fullerton rally speech on 28 April warned of instability if a few ministers were lost. Yet, this raises serious questions about the PAP’s leadership depth and Singapore’s political resilience. True strength lies in strong institutions, not near-total dominance at the ballot box.

https://www.theonlinecitizen.com/2025/04...esilience/

[Wy:Nox]

Here we go again with the PaP Poor Succession Planning. SM LHL also took ages with this and now, PM LW seems lagging with the new Succession Plan for proactive changes in GE that requires a round of new musical chair. Frankly, he is beating us for disrupting PaP and making us responsible for his leadership inadequacies.

[winbig]

If the so called minister can lose, that means he/she is not minister calibre.

[[[ForeverAlone]]]

He using the SAME trick like that crap LHL when he is PM back in last GE.

Remember how he put Heng ?

Now Lawrence wong do the same put Gan.

Don't be shock this trick works again.

[red3]

ministers is not civil service and civil service is not ministers.

And along the line to blur this over time, this is being taken for granted.

[RiseofAsia]

He using the SAME trick like that crap LHL when he is PM back in last GE.

Remember how he put Heng ?

Now Lawrence wong do the same put Gan.

Don't be shock this trick works again.

被骗一次，不是你的错.
被骗两次，就是你蠢lah.

[Rainforest]

To me, All ministers quality are same lar
None of them passed the rating. So make no difference who is going to be minister