Bloomberg: Nearly half of 2024 GCB transactions lack public record
#1

Bloomberg: Nearly half of 2024 GCB transactions lack public record, raising transparency concerns 

Singapore’s exclusive Good Class Bungalow (GCB) market, marked by secrecy and trust use, is at the heart of a debate over transparency. 

Bloomberg reported that Manpower Minister Tan See Leng acquired a GCB in Brizay Park for S$27.3 million in 2023, yet public records are absent. 

The transaction was revealed solely through Bloomberg’s report, similar to the sale of K Shanmugam's S$88 million GCB.

https://www.theonlinecitizen.com/2024/12...-concerns/
Reply
#2

Transparency Concerns in Singapore's GCB Market
 
Title: Bloomberg: Nearly Half of 2024 GCB Transactions Lack Public Record, Raising Transparency Concerns
 
Source: The Online Citizen, December 12, 2024
 
Author: Not specified
 
Article Summary:
 
Theme: The article highlights the growing issue of transparency in Singapore's Good Class Bungalow (GCB) market, where a significant number of transactions lack public records, raising concerns about accountability and oversight.
 
Core Points:
 
- Nearly half of GCB transactions in 2024 lacked property caveats, legal filings that record ownership and ensure transparency.

- This trend allows buyers to keep transactions hidden from public scrutiny, raising concerns about oversight in the high-value property market.

- The involvement of lawmakers in such opaque dealings raises questions about transparency and accountability.

- Critics argue that participation in transactions that exploit legal mechanisms for privacy stands in contrast to the values of openness and fairness these officials are expected to uphold.

- The use of trusts to obscure ownership details in the GCB market is becoming increasingly common, further fueling concerns about transparency.

- Singapore imposes a 65% tax on residential property purchases through trusts, but enforcement challenges persist due to the secrecy surrounding beneficiaries.
 
Phenomenon:
 
- The article highlights two specific cases:

- Manpower Minister Tan See Leng's purchase of a GCB in Brizay Park for S$27.3 million in 2023, which was revealed solely through Bloomberg's report.

- Law Minister K Shanmugam's sale of a GCB in Queen Astrid Park for S$88 million through a trust, with the identity of the ultimate beneficiary undisclosed.
 
Additional Information:
 
- The GCB market is increasingly favoured by wealthy migrants and the ultra-rich, contributing to its exclusivity and high median prices.

- The article emphasizes the need for stronger safeguards to address secrecy in the elite property sector and preserve public trust.

- The dual revelations of Minister Tan's purchase and Minister Shanmugam's sale illustrate the urgency of addressing transparency concerns in this sector.
Reply
#3

(12-12-2024, 09:17 PM)Bigiron Wrote:  Transparency Concerns in Singapore's GCB Market
 
Title: Bloomberg: Nearly Half of 2024 GCB Transactions Lack Public Record, Raising Transparency Concerns
 
Source: The Online Citizen, December 12, 2024
 
Author: Not specified
 
Article Summary:
 
Theme: The article highlights the growing issue of transparency in Singapore's Good Class Bungalow (GCB) market, where a significant number of transactions lack public records, raising concerns about accountability and oversight.
 
Core Points:
 
- Nearly half of GCB transactions in 2024 lacked property caveats, legal filings that record ownership and ensure transparency.

- This trend allows buyers to keep transactions hidden from public scrutiny, raising concerns about oversight in the high-value property market.

- The involvement of lawmakers in such opaque dealings raises questions about transparency and accountability.

- Critics argue that participation in transactions that exploit legal mechanisms for privacy stands in contrast to the values of openness and fairness these officials are expected to uphold.

- The use of trusts to obscure ownership details in the GCB market is becoming increasingly common, further fueling concerns about transparency.

- Singapore imposes a 65% tax on residential property purchases through trusts, but enforcement challenges persist due to the secrecy surrounding beneficiaries.
 
Phenomenon:
 
- The article highlights two specific cases:

- Manpower Minister Tan See Leng's purchase of a GCB in Brizay Park for S$27.3 million in 2023, which was revealed solely through Bloomberg's report.

- Law Minister K Shanmugam's sale of a GCB in Queen Astrid Park for S$88 million through a trust, with the identity of the ultimate beneficiary undisclosed.
 
Additional Information:
 
- The GCB market is increasingly favoured by wealthy migrants and the ultra-rich, contributing to its exclusivity and high median prices.

- The article emphasizes the need for stronger safeguards to address secrecy in the elite property sector and preserve public trust.

- The dual revelations of Minister Tan's purchase and Minister Shanmugam's sale illustrate the urgency of addressing transparency concerns in this sector.

spore population hitting 15 m is also no problem for these filthy rich ministers as their residence is v exclusive  free from noise n crowds
Reply
#4

That’s why they practice ownself check ownself.
[+] 1 user Likes Ken's post
Reply
#5

People want to know ... who we are .... So we tell them ....
[+] 1 user Likes red3's post
Reply
#6

(13-12-2024, 02:35 PM)Ken Wrote:  That’s why they practice ownself check ownself.

yes
that why they knew there is a flaw in ownself check ownself scheme
cause ownself cannot check ownself backside hole
Reply
#7

People should really stop highlighting that Singapore is a money laundering haven. It doesn't take a lot of intelligence to know a tiny island has been a sweet spot for over 6 decades for activities that is best kept quiet about...
Reply
#8

how do u buy a gcb in singapore without any record?
gcb used as money laundering tool ah
[+] 1 user Likes singaporean1964's post
Reply
#9

Double standard, you dont know meh?

“Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind"
Reply
#10

URA under MND has 4 NEW Board of DIRECTORS

i.  Dr Chong Yoke Sin, Managing Partner, iGlobe Partners Pte Ltd;

ii. Ms Choo Oi Yee, Chief Executive Officer, ADDX;

iii. Mr Zahidi Abdul Rahman, Principal Architect, Zahidi A R Arkitek; and

iv. Mrs Nina Yang, Chief Executive Officer, SJ CityGlobal, Surbana Jurong Pte Ltd.

---------------------------------------------------

They are hired for a special reason?

Their Annual Reports must be full of flaws

Why do we need 5 Mayors and 80 PAP Ministers? 
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)