[Bigiron]

👩‍👩‍👦‍👦 Budget 2025 Large Families Scheme not an incentive or reward: Indranee

As part of new measures to encourage Singaporeans to have more children, parents will receive a $5,000 Large Family MediSave grant for each third and subsequent child born from Feb 18.

READ: https://asia1.news/4bhxL9t

Follow @AsiaOnecom for all the latest updates.

[Bigiron]

The article and Indranee Rajah's statements present a nuanced perspective on the Large Families Scheme, but there are inconsistencies and potential flaws in the logic presented:
 
Inconsistency:
 
- Framing vs. Reality: The article states the scheme is "not an incentive or reward" and is meant to provide "financial support." However, the offered benefits (MediSave grant, LifeSG credits, CDA grant) are undeniably financial incentives aimed at influencing family planning decisions. This disconnect in framing creates confusion.
 
Potential Flaws:
 
- Oversimplification of Motivation: The argument that the scheme is "not an incentive" ignores the psychological and practical realities of family planning. Financial considerations play a significant role, even if not the sole motivator.
 
- Lack of Context: The article focuses on the government's perspective, but doesn't adequately explore the complex factors influencing Singaporeans' decisions to have children. Economic anxieties, societal pressures, and changing family structures are not adequately addressed.
 
- Potential for Unintended Consequences: While the scheme aims to encourage families to have a third child, it might inadvertently discourage families from having a second child, as they may wait to access the benefits for a third.
 
Overall:
 
- The article's focus on "not being an incentive" feels disingenuous and may be seen as a way to deflect criticism of the scheme's potentially coercive nature.
 
- A more transparent and nuanced discussion acknowledging the role of financial incentives while addressing the complexities of family planning would be more impactful.
 
For a more balanced discussion, the article should consider:
 
- Data on birth rates and family planning trends: How have these trends changed over time, and what are the contributing factors?
 
- Social and economic costs of a declining birth rate: What are the potential long-term implications for Singapore's workforce, social safety net, and national identity?
 
- Alternative strategies to address the declining birth rate: What are some other policy options beyond financial incentives?
 
This would create a more complete and informed discussion about the Large Families Scheme and its potential impact on Singaporean families.

[[[ForeverAlone]]]

Currently those having Large family actually in the first place are well to do.

[Bigiron]

https://youtube.com/shorts/wfLTcFv19OI?s...7ytDasRFBT