Posts: 1,106
   
Threads: 3
    
Likes Received: 393 in 299 posts
Likes Given: 264
This Govt jumped into new changes without contigency buffer for us. Those above 50 years old will not trust the Govt. Put the savings into Long Term is a better alternative.
Win the World but lost your Soul.
>
Posts: 1,461
   
Threads: 3
    
Likes Received: 719 in 531 posts
Likes Given: 3,235
sg is doomed, cpf is a scam to setup to buff you to keep working. rules change when situation change according to pap.
Posts: 5,455
   
Threads: 34
    
Likes Received: 1,950 in 1,490 posts
Likes Given: 374
(23-02-2024, 07:54 PM)Ola Wrote: If they anyhow change, the whole Singapore will go and RIOT
Especially that Jac Lau, may even commit suicide
Jac CPF has little in SA lah. His million dollar mostly in OA.
Posts: 2,113
   
Threads: 53
    
Likes Received: 602 in 502 posts
Likes Given: 461
Whatthe noises for the demise of CPF SA. I thought many CPF members claimed they can better managed their money and wants Govt to return CPF funds. Now with the demise of CPF SA these 55 yrs members can withdraw all their excess funds and made better investment on their own. Isn't it good for them?.
Posts: 22,398
   
Threads: 6,351
    
Likes Received: 4,133 in 3,239 posts
Likes Given: 490
Is it a good idea to top until ERS?
RA works like this.
1. You accumulate interest at 4% into own account until age 65.
2. After 65, your interest goes to common pool. If you choose to get monthly pay out it comes from your own account. So you get no interest yinto your account and start to drawdown your account.
3. By age 80yo your account is depleted and you start to withdraw from common pool.
So I'd you die before 80 and after 65...you will be contributing to common pool without taking out of it.
Whether CPF Life is good for you depends on how long you live. If you live to exactly 80, you lose out the most in terms of interest.
So I consider CPF Life a risky bet on your life.
That is why many wanted safer option of CPF SA to accumulate interest.
The financial worse case is people who top up to ERS and die at age 80...they are losing hundred thousand in interest....
CPF Life forces us to bet on our lifespan.....
I, being poor, have only my dreams; I have spread my dreams under your feet; Tread softly because you tread on my dreams.
>
(This post was last modified: 24-02-2024, 10:57 AM by
sgbuffett.)
Posts: 2,800
   
Threads: 1
    
Likes Received: 514 in 489 posts
Likes Given: 1
Posts: 22,398
   
Threads: 6,351
    
Likes Received: 4,133 in 3,239 posts
Likes Given: 490
(24-02-2024, 11:41 AM)sgxin Wrote: CPF Life will be a bad scheme for most imo as most people will not live beyond 85yo.
A CPF member who tops up the ERS limit of $426K at 55yo will suffer the max interest loss of $415K if he/she is to die at 76yo.
If there is RSS, his beneficiaries will be getting this $415K amount.
Thus I feel CPF should have retained the RSS scheme as an option for members to decide how much RA fund to be parked under RSS and CPF Life respectively.
E.g. $300K into RSS and $126K into CPF Life.
Interest bal under the 3 scenarios - leaving $426K in OA, putting into RSS RA and CPF Life RA:
![[Image: 2024-02-24-11-46-20-1.png]](https://i.ibb.co/VSJTvq7/2024-02-24-11-46-20-1.png)
All 3 assume a monthly payout of $3.3K.
Under RSS, a $426K with 4% interest will last till 90yo, which is more than the life expectancy of Sporeans.
ERS mainly benefits those who live about 88yo which is a minority.
Also, the payout is conservative ...by right the payout should be higher so people break even compared with 4% fixed return at age 84 not 88 since 84 us average lifespans.
The govt adjust the payout down to make 88 the break even age I believe to accumulate more in the interest pool as reserves for future and uncertainty cushioning...this does not benefit you at all you are just contributing to stabilise the scheme for future generations.
Basically the odds are stacked against you. That is why people who have done their sums put as much as possible in CPF SA when the 4% generate enough monthly expenses it lasts forever.
Also CPF Life is not inflation adjusted which makes it extremely risky....imagine a few years of highbinflation the payout becomes inadequate.
Inflation risk actually makes putting the money in a good equity mix safer and provides better assurance for retirement.
I, being poor, have only my dreams; I have spread my dreams under your feet; Tread softly because you tread on my dreams.
>
Posts: 14,188
   
Threads: 486
    
Likes Received: 5,990 in 4,783 posts
Likes Given: 4,647
(24-02-2024, 10:56 AM)sgbuffett Wrote: Is it a good idea to top until ERS?
RA works like this.
1. You accumulate interest at 4% into own account until age 65.
2. After 65, your interest goes to common pool. If you choose to get monthly pay out it comes from your own account. So you get no interest yinto your account and start to drawdown your account.
3. By age 80yo your account is depleted and you start to withdraw from common pool.
So I'd you die before 80 and after 65...you will be contributing to common pool without taking out of it.
Whether CPF Life is good for you depends on how long you live. If you live to exactly 80, you lose out the most in terms of interest.
So I consider CPF Life a risky bet on your life.
That is why many wanted safer option of CPF SA to accumulate interest.
The financial worse case is people who top up to ERS and die at age 80...they are losing hundred thousand in interest....
CPF Life forces us to bet on our lifespan.....
But the Govt reminded us to complete the Nomination Form
Is it another scam to deceive us??
CPFB | Making a CPF nomination
Why do we need 5 Mayors and 80 PAP Ministers?
>
Posts: 315
   
Threads: 37
    
Likes Received: 47 in 42 posts
Likes Given: 1
No point transfering SA to RA to hit the ERS as goalpost may shift over the next few years thus CPF become Cannot Payout For (U) ?
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)