Posts: 5,789
   
Threads: 371
    
Likes Received: 1,560 in 1,379 posts
Likes Given: 2,047
Posts: 4,836
   
Threads: 113
    
Likes Received: 1,639 in 1,263 posts
Likes Given: 1,205
(29-09-2021, 12:37 PM)Galilo_l Wrote: HSA need more data 
But don't need more data from Pfizer n Moderna last time.... US vacc
And also no need more data from Novavax...US vacc
O.k. we get the drift...
Posts: 5,789
   
Threads: 371
    
Likes Received: 1,560 in 1,379 posts
Likes Given: 2,047
(29-09-2021, 12:52 PM)RichDad Wrote: But don't need more data from Pfizer n Moderna last time.... US vacc
And also no need more data from Novavax...US vacc
O.k. we get the drift...
No need cuz G is one of the stakeholders
There is no right or wrong decisions.
One only has to bear the consequences that one makes
>
Posts: 8,038
   
Threads: 17
    
Likes Received: 1,563 in 1,315 posts
Likes Given: 521
river spirit said china ones lousy
Posts: 6,641
   
Threads: 157
    
Likes Received: 961 in 891 posts
Likes Given: 299
(29-09-2021, 08:17 PM)WhatDoYouThink? Wrote: river spirit said china ones lousy
Sinovac real world protection is around 20% higher than media report.
Often presented 50.4% is for vaccination in between two weeks.
But after trial, recommendation is three or up to four weeks
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/...using-data
Nearly 1,400 of the 13,000 people who took part in clinical trials of Sinovac’s vaccine, called CoronaVac, received their doses three weeks apart, while most of the volunteers in the Brazil-based trials got the second jab two weeks after the first. The protection rate for the smaller group was nearly 20 percentage points higher than the 50.4% rate observed in the majority, Sinovac said in a written response to Bloomberg News.
(This post was last modified: 29-09-2021, 09:31 PM by
watchfirst9.)