![](https://i.imgur.com/CLvY2jA.png")
19-12-2024, 06:06 AM
Round about answer in this article
PM Wong outlines efforts to address cost of living concerns
https://mothership.sg/2024/10/wong-cost-...al%20terms.
Based on the article, I've identified some examples of roundabout answers provided by PM Wong:
Types of Roundabout Answers
*1. Deflecting the Question*
PM Wong was asked about the cost of living, but he deflected the question by talking about the government's efforts to support low-income families.
*2. Providing Unrelated Information*
When asked about the cost of living, PM Wong mentioned that Singaporeans are "better off in real terms" due to economic growth, but didn't directly address the cost of living concern.
*3. Making General Statements*
PM Wong stated that the government is "committed to ensuring that Singaporeans have access to affordable healthcare, education, and housing," but didn't provide specific details on how they plan to address the cost of living issue.
*4. Shifting the Focus*
When asked about the cost of living, PM Wong shifted the focus to the importance of economic growth and job creation, rather than directly addressing the cost of living concern.
*5. Using Vague Language*
PM Wong used vague language, such as "we are committed to ensuring that Singaporeans are better off," without providing specific details or metrics to support his claim.
You're right to question why these are considered roundabout answers. While they might not be outright evasive, they do exhibit characteristics of avoiding a direct, clear, and specific response to the core question about the cost of living.
why each example is considered roundabout:
- 1. Deflecting the Question: Instead of addressing the cost of living directly, the answer shifts the focus to a related but different issue (government support for low-income families). This avoids directly acknowledging the cost of living concerns.
- 2. Providing Unrelated Information: The answer mentions economic growth, which is a positive factor, but doesn't directly address how this growth impacts the cost of living. It's like saying "the weather is nice" when asked about a traffic jam.
- 3. Making General Statements: The answer makes a broad commitment to affordability, but lacks specific details on how the government will address the cost of living. It's a general statement that doesn't provide concrete solutions.
- 4. Shifting the Focus: Similar to deflecting, this answer emphasizes economic growth and job creation, which are important, but don't directly address the cost of living concerns. It shifts the conversation away from the core issue.
- 5. Using Vague Language: The answer uses phrases like "we are committed" without offering specific details or metrics. This lacks transparency and avoids providing concrete evidence of how the government plans to tackle the cost of living.
In essence, these answers provide a general overview of government efforts, but they lack the specifics and directness needed to address the cost of living concerns head-on. This can be perceived as a roundabout way of answering the question, leaving the audience with more questions than answers.
PM Wong outlines efforts to address cost of living concerns
https://mothership.sg/2024/10/wong-cost-...al%20terms.
Based on the article, I've identified some examples of roundabout answers provided by PM Wong:
Types of Roundabout Answers
*1. Deflecting the Question*
PM Wong was asked about the cost of living, but he deflected the question by talking about the government's efforts to support low-income families.
*2. Providing Unrelated Information*
When asked about the cost of living, PM Wong mentioned that Singaporeans are "better off in real terms" due to economic growth, but didn't directly address the cost of living concern.
*3. Making General Statements*
PM Wong stated that the government is "committed to ensuring that Singaporeans have access to affordable healthcare, education, and housing," but didn't provide specific details on how they plan to address the cost of living issue.
*4. Shifting the Focus*
When asked about the cost of living, PM Wong shifted the focus to the importance of economic growth and job creation, rather than directly addressing the cost of living concern.
*5. Using Vague Language*
PM Wong used vague language, such as "we are committed to ensuring that Singaporeans are better off," without providing specific details or metrics to support his claim.
You're right to question why these are considered roundabout answers. While they might not be outright evasive, they do exhibit characteristics of avoiding a direct, clear, and specific response to the core question about the cost of living.
why each example is considered roundabout:
- 1. Deflecting the Question: Instead of addressing the cost of living directly, the answer shifts the focus to a related but different issue (government support for low-income families). This avoids directly acknowledging the cost of living concerns.
- 2. Providing Unrelated Information: The answer mentions economic growth, which is a positive factor, but doesn't directly address how this growth impacts the cost of living. It's like saying "the weather is nice" when asked about a traffic jam.
- 3. Making General Statements: The answer makes a broad commitment to affordability, but lacks specific details on how the government will address the cost of living. It's a general statement that doesn't provide concrete solutions.
- 4. Shifting the Focus: Similar to deflecting, this answer emphasizes economic growth and job creation, which are important, but don't directly address the cost of living concerns. It shifts the conversation away from the core issue.
- 5. Using Vague Language: The answer uses phrases like "we are committed" without offering specific details or metrics. This lacks transparency and avoids providing concrete evidence of how the government plans to tackle the cost of living.
In essence, these answers provide a general overview of government efforts, but they lack the specifics and directness needed to address the cost of living concerns head-on. This can be perceived as a roundabout way of answering the question, leaving the audience with more questions than answers.
