Posts: 3,883
Threads: 278
Likes Received: 301 in 284 posts
Likes Given: 8
09-09-2022, 03:30 PM
(09-09-2022, 09:53 AM)teaserteam Wrote: China rep replied that their policy is the best with lowest cost and effectiveness !!!. Anyone disagree?
https://twitter.com/i/status/1567837619706281984
The economic losses will b gigantic if this is discounted, it might b cost effective. See it more as penny-wise pound foolish acts if the economic losses discounted. Forget about businesses losses, just count the lost time doing the Covid test is good enough to tell. Of course no one have good figures.
Omi.. Thank you for bumping up the message.
(This post was last modified: 09-09-2022, 03:32 PM by
teaserteam.)
Posts: 8,038
Threads: 17
Likes Received: 1,563 in 1,315 posts
Likes Given: 521
it's like saying since all yr partners are careless, bohcap, and no take precautions, so it doesn't make sense for you alone to do the necessary, it won't be sustainable, might as well tang ping and bai lan like them
Posts: 15,200
Threads: 1
Likes Received: 3,126 in 2,938 posts
Likes Given: 81
we have to wait a little longer.
Covid19 never existed.
second WEF is held in Davos(winter) and also in China (summer)
Vatican Bank is ordered to return all funds abroad.
We have King Charles 111
Posts: 1,726
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 422 in 352 posts
Likes Given: 20
Between covid death vs freedom, I choose freedom. What we are doing is definitely better than PRC.
![](https://i.imgur.com/CLvY2jA.png")
