Posts: 4,210
   
Threads: 47
    
Likes Received: 545 in 501 posts
Likes Given: 152
Need some advice who ish SURE notch happy about this again lololololol 🤣
Posts: 11,066
   
Threads: 546
    
Likes Received: 2,412 in 2,050 posts
Likes Given: 1,253
(06-08-2025, 01:11 PM)revealer Wrote: There is nothing to rebuke as ST did not said China was responsible. The word “China” was mentioned twice and “Chinese” was mentioned once in the news report. When “China” was mentioned, ST referred to what Mediant’s reported. The term “Chinese” is a common nouce, it can be referring to National Chinese, Malaysian or SG Chinese.
https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/w...astructure
The Chinese is very specific in its rebuke - It is referring to the ST reporter writing which is loaded with innuendos based on "claims" from a Google-owned coy.
By playing dumb like
revealer does with "Chinese" is not going help ST credibility when all Shanmugam did was point fingers at "UNC3886" not China.

The last paragraph in the embassy Letter essentially questioned Strait Time's editorial objectivity..
What we need in addressing cyber threats is solidarity and cooperation, not mutual accusations. We hope that The Straits Times will objectively reflect the contents of this report in its future coverage.
Song Chao
First Secretary
Embassy of The People’s Republic of China in the Republic of Singapore
You've got friendly neighbours? Grow Up! - 李光耀 2013
>
Posts: 4,252
   
Threads: 352
    
Likes Received: 283 in 264 posts
Likes Given: 7
(06-08-2025, 04:56 PM)Manthink Wrote: The Chinese is very specific in its rebuke - It is referring to the ST reporter writing which is loaded with innuendos based on "claims" from a Google-owned coy.
By playing dumb like revealer does with "Chinese" is not going help ST credibility when all Shanmugam did was point fingers at "UNC3886" not China. 
The last paragraph in the embassy Letter essentially questioned Strait Time's editorial objectivity..
What we need in addressing cyber threats is solidarity and cooperation, not mutual accusations. We hope that The Straits Times will objectively reflect the contents of this report in its future coverage.
Song Chao
First Secretary
Embassy of The People’s Republic of China in the Reof Singapore
A fact is a fact. If Mediant has a public report, anyone can quote it. U can blame ST is not sensitive but u can’t rebuke anything factual unless u dun know and can’t differentiate what is a fact what is not a fact. China Embassy should just say China has nothing to do with UNC 3886 and blame ST for not been sensitive to quote China. It is then up to the readers to judge.
Omni is in my ignored list. This works well like he always bumps my post for me all the time. Thank u Omni.
>
(This post was last modified: 06-08-2025, 07:31 PM by
revealer.)
Posts: 7,295
   
Threads: 2,019
    
Likes Received: 1,658 in 1,376 posts
Likes Given: 11,237
We all knows ST and CNA are both pro US anti China MSM
(This post was last modified: 06-08-2025, 07:48 PM by
CHAOS.)
Posts: 4,252
   
Threads: 352
    
Likes Received: 283 in 264 posts
Likes Given: 7
As a newspaper, their job is to report the news factually. If they reported the fact wrongly, u rebuke.
Omni is in my ignored list. This works well like he always bumps my post for me all the time. Thank u Omni.
>
(This post was last modified: 06-08-2025, 07:45 PM by
revealer.)
Posts: 2,537
   
Threads: 233
    
Likes Received: 1,026 in 761 posts
Likes Given: 2,412
(06-08-2025, 07:37 PM)revealer Wrote: As a newspaper, their job is to report the news factually. If they reported the fact wrongly, u rebuke.
F...k off you stinking CECA poopjeet cunt!!
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)