Drastically lowering' BTO prices by disregarding land costs will only end up ' '
#1

'Drastically lowering' BTO prices by disregarding land costs will only end up 'hurting all Singaporeans': Sim Ann
https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapor...?cid=FBcna&fbclid=IwAR3GQSX9BAtnXsYFxR1s2iTnUE6AiaxsrL7qJMhCk8JZGywweND-tCHPlaI
[+] 1 user Likes Bigiron's post
Reply
#2

Simi Lan how does that hurt Singaporean?
Reply
#3

(12-12-2022, 12:07 AM)Bigiron Wrote:  Simi Lan how does that hurt Singaporean?

I think it's along the same arguement of weaker mandate for PAP means guaranteed less effective PAP... Party whip till all just singing same song to get their big paycheck lah... Everyone is just trying to gain and game lah. No choice..
[+] 2 users Like Sticw's post
Reply
#4

(12-12-2022, 12:07 AM)Bigiron Wrote:  Simi Lan how does that hurt Singaporean?

no use arguing with those greedy PAP cock sucker


that why i love brave UK voted for BREXIT

there was a question before the BREXIT
can UK live without EU?

UK fark care and voted BREXIT
UK no EU would die huan

same here
you need to vote for a party who can lead and help singaporean get a better life and make sense that what PAP is doing is helping themselves in the corrupted ponzi scheme
[+] 1 user Likes grotesqueness's post
Reply
#5

We are screwed. Song Boh!
Greed has no limit. Welcome to modern Property slavery.
All the actions done today will be paid back by next generation.

“Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind"
[+] 1 user Likes RiseofAsia's post
Reply
#6

(12-12-2022, 03:36 AM)grotesqueness Wrote:  no use arguing with those greedy PAP cock sucker


that why i love brave UK voted for BREXIT

there was a question before the BREXIT
can UK live without EU?

UK fark care and voted BREXIT
UK no EU would die huan

same here
you need to vote for a party who can lead and help singaporean get a better life and make sense that what PAP is doing is helping themselves in the corrupted ponzi scheme
Yes, we need to vote wisely come the next GE, getting more opposition parties into parliament to counter the greedy PAP, who tells us wrong facts..... Big Grin
[+] 1 user Likes debono's post
Reply
#7

I disagree with ah leong on removing land cost. Makes no sense. He only open up himself to get poked.

Many people kena the Halo Effect. Because Ah Leong is deemed a good oppie so they always side him.

PS seems better at this oppie thing. Bo luan hoot.. .. must thank him for getting hdb to open books.

Anyway more oppies can only be good for SG.
Reply
#8

PAP should sell 2 rm for $2m so that sinkees can benefit from the high price.🤣🤣🤣
Reply
#9

There are always 2 sides of the coin. The have nots will always crow for lower prices. The haves will be totally pissed that their property values will drop drastically.

And guess if these so called elites own tonnes of property Big Grin

Wherever you go, no matter what the weather, always bring your own sunshine Big Grin
[+] 1 user Likes p1acebo's post
Reply
#10

(12-12-2022, 07:54 AM)Notdumb Wrote:  PAP should sell 2 rm for $2m so that sinkees can benefit from the high price.🤣🤣🤣

屋子是拿来住的,不是炒的! Rotfl
This garment shd tear down BT and build 40 level HDB. It can increase pop to 6.9 million.
Since they are addicted to importing.

“Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind"
Reply
#11

(12-12-2022, 07:48 AM)RichDad Wrote:  I disagree with ah leong on removing land cost.  Makes no sense. He only open up himself to get poked.

Many people kena the Halo Effect.  Because Ah Leong is deemed a good oppie so they always side him.

PS seems better at this oppie thing. Bo luan hoot.. .. must thank him for getting hdb to open books.

Anyway more oppies can only be good for SG.

No need more oppies....just need to get rid of PAP.
[+] 1 user Likes Notdumb's post
Reply
#12

(12-12-2022, 08:00 AM)Notdumb Wrote:  No need more oppies....just need to get rid of PAP.

That's best but that means more oppies mah. Need time to build up oppies camp.

One party rule must end.
[+] 1 user Likes RichDad's post
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)