[Bigiron]

#GE2025: "We hear you, I hear you," said PM Lawrence Wong as he reached out to young Singaporeans and first-time voters in a video message.

He said that he wants to work with the young to take on challenges to come, and he sees many things that should be improved. https://str.sg/DYFU

Here are some potential "bullshit" or questionable aspects of the statement from PM Lawrence Wong in the #GE2025 context:  

1. **Vague Promises** – "We hear you" and "I hear you" are classic political platitudes with no concrete plans or commitments. It’s easy to say but hard to verify if real action follows.  

2. **Pandering to Young Voters** – Politicians often make broad appeals to youth and first-time voters during elections but may not follow through with meaningful policy changes afterward.  

3. **Lack of Specifics** – Saying "many things should be improved" is intentionally vague. What exactly? Housing? Jobs? Climate policy? Without specifics, it’s just empty rhetoric.  

4. **Election-Time Empathy** – Politicians suddenly "reach out" when they need votes. Where was this engagement outside of election season?  

5. **"Work with the young" – Tokenism?** – Does this mean actual policy co-creation, or just symbolic gestures like youth forums that lead to little real change?  

6. **Media-Managed Messaging** – A pre-recorded video is a controlled, one-way communication. Real engagement would involve unscripted Q&A or tangible policy discussions.  

### Bottom Line:  
It’s a typical election-season appeal—designed to sound empathetic and proactive, but the real test is whether it translates into **actionable policies** and **sustained engagement** beyond the
 campaign period.

[Bigiron]

Let’s **deepen the bullshit analysis** of PM Lawrence Wong’s statement—because political rhetoric deserves scrutiny. Here’s a breakdown of why this could be more fluff than substance: 

---

### **1. "We Hear You" – The Illusion of Listening** 
**Why it’s bullshit:** 
- **No evidence of prior listening:** If the government truly "heard" young Singaporeans, where were the major policy shifts *before* election season? 
- **No acknowledgment of past grievances:** Did they address existing youth concerns (e.g., cost of living, mental health, over-competition) *before* this video? Or is this just damage control? 
- **Listening ≠ Changing:** Governments love to say they’re listening, but real listening means **policy adjustments**, not just PR. 

**Question to ask:** *What specific feedback from young people has already led to policy changes?* 

---

### **2. "Work With the Young" – Co-Option vs. Real Empowerment** 
**Why it’s bullshit:** 
- **Youth panels & token engagement:** Singapore has a history of state-sanctioned "youth dialogues" that are tightly controlled, with little impact on actual policymaking. 
- **Who defines "working together"?** If the government sets the agenda, filters the participants, and controls the outcomes, is it real collaboration—or just performative inclusion? 
- **No structural power shift:** Are young people being given real decision-making authority (e.g., in Parliament, ministries), or just invited to "give feedback" that gets ignored? 

**Question to ask:** *Can you name one major policy in the last 5 years that was significantly altered due to youth input?* 

---

### **3. "Take on Challenges to Come" – Vague, Non-Committal, Fear-Based** 
**Why it’s bullshit:** 
- **What challenges?** Climate change? AI disruption? Housing shortages? If he doesn’t name them, he can’t be held accountable for failing to address them. 
- **Future-framing avoids present accountability:** Politicians love talking about "future challenges" because it distracts from **current failures** (e.g., cost of living, inequality). 
- **No policy roadmap:** "We’ll work on it" is meaningless without a timeline, budget, or clear plan. 

**Question to ask:** *What are the top 3 challenges for young Singaporeans, and what exact policies will you implement in your first year to address them?* 

---

### **4. "Many Things Should Be Improved" – A Masterclass in Vagueness** 
**Why it’s bullshit:** 
- **Safe, non-controversial phrasing:** It’s a way to admit *something* is wrong without naming what, who’s responsible, or how it’ll be fixed. 
- **Implies past failures, but no accountability:** If "many things" need improving, doesn’t that mean the current leadership (including Wong’s party) failed before? 
- **No prioritization:** Is he talking about healthcare, education, LGBTQ+ rights, or something else? Without specifics, it’s just **political filler**. 

**Question to ask:** *Name three policies your government got wrong in the last decade, and how you’ll fix them.* 

---

### **5. The Medium: A Scripted Video, Not Real Engagement** 
**Why it’s bullshit:** 
- **One-way communication:** A pre-recorded message allows zero accountability—no tough questions, no pushback, no spontaneity. 
- **Election-mode empathy:** If Wong really wanted to engage youth, why not host an **unscripted town hall** where he answers unfiltered questions? 
- **Social media ≠ Governance:** A nice video doesn’t mean policy change. It’s **optics over action**. 

**Question to ask:** *Will you commit to monthly unscripted dialogues with young voters if elected?* 

---

### **Final Verdict: Bullshit Probability = High** 
This is **classic political campaigning**: 
✅ **Safe, feel-good rhetoric** ("We hear you") 
✅ **Vague promises** ("Work together") 
✅ **No hard commitments** ("Improve things") 
✅ **Election-timed "empathy"** (Where was this energy last year?) 

**Real test:** If Wong wins, will we see **concrete youth-driven policy shifts**, or will this fade into the usual post-election silence?

[Wy:Nox]

He never hear the middle age for many years so what makes the young voters think PM LW will hear them?

[Alice Alicia]

Did he hear this?

[Ernesto]

老了没用了。。。🤔

[grotesqueness]

"We hear you, I hear you," said PM Lawrence Wong

"i am not listening. I DO IT MY WAYYYYYYYYY" said PM Lawrence Wong

[Geneco]

Need some advice if he heard the usual suspects are still too scared to update their latest mRNA jabs lololololol... 🤣

[RiseofAsia]

Become deaf after GE lah.

Farking crowded Sg
High COE
High property price
High cost of living
High medical cost
Low TFR
CPF cant retire happily
5C become 1C.
Sg becomes Indiapore.