29-05-2025, 08:25 AM
“The court does not pass upon the wisdom or likely effectiveness [of tarriffs],” a three-judge panel said in the decision. “That use is impermissible not because it is unwise or ineffective, but because [federal law] does not allow it.”
https://www.theage.com.au/world/north-am...5m36g.html
https://www.theage.com.au/world/north-am...5m36g.html