[Bigiron]

“We are very sorry to have caused (the public) much anxiety."

JUST IN: Minister Josephine Teo has apologised for the confusion caused by its policy to unmask NRIC numbers.

 https://cna.asia/3BBxpwO

[Bigiron]

Why is the government changing the way NRIC numbers are used?

Minister Josephine Teo says the way they're currently used creates a "false sense of security" and makes us vulnerable: https://cna.asia/3VI3nhW

[Bigiron]

ACRA will restore its search function on the Bizfile portal next week, but will not show NRIC numbers - masked or otherwise.

You'd have to pay S$33 to view such details: https://cna.asia/3VKIp1I

[[[ForeverAlone]]]

ACRA will restore its search function on the Bizfile portal next week, but will not show NRIC numbers - masked or otherwise.

You'd have to pay S$33 to view such details: https://cna.asia/3VKIp1I

wow pay last time free , lol plot twist

[Bigiron]

“We are very sorry to have caused (the public) much anxiety."

JUST IN: Minister Josephine Teo has apologised for the confusion caused by its policy to unmask NRIC numbers.

 https://cna.asia/3BBxpwO

Analysis of the Article: "We are very sorry to have caused (the public) much anxiety." JUST IN: Minister Josephine Teo has apologised for the confusion caused by its policy to unmask NRIC numbers.

Inconsistent:

- "Much anxiety" vs. "confusion": The apology uses two different terms to describe the public's reaction. While "anxiety" implies a deeper level of worry, "confusion" suggests a misunderstanding. This inconsistency might be deliberate to downplay the severity of the public's reaction.

Ambiguities:

- "Its policy":  The article doesn't explicitly state who "its" refers to. It's unclear if it's referring to the government, the specific ministry, or a particular department. This ambiguity could be used to deflect responsibility.

Flaw:

- Lack of specific details: The apology doesn't provide any concrete information about the policy change or the reasons for the confusion. This lack of detail makes it difficult for the public to understand the situation fully and assess the apology's sincerity.

Weasel Words:

- "Very sorry":  While expressing regret, the phrase "very sorry" is a relatively weak form of apology. It lacks a strong commitment to addressing the issue or preventing similar problems in the future.

Loaded Language:

- "Much anxiety":  This phrase is loaded with negative connotations, suggesting that the public is deeply distressed. This language could be used to evoke sympathy for the government while downplaying the policy's impact.

Propaganda and Fallacy:

- Appealing to Emotion: The apology focuses on the public's emotional response ("anxiety" and "confusion") rather than addressing the substance of the policy change. This tactic aims to deflect criticism and garner public support.
- Bandwagon Fallacy:  The article implies that the public is universally anxious or confused, potentially exaggerating the extent of the public's reaction. This tactic attempts to create a sense of widespread agreement while minimizing dissenting voices.

Overall:

While the statement expresses regret, it lacks specific details and relies on loaded language and emotional appeals. This suggests a potential attempt to downplay the policy's impact and deflect criticism without offering a genuine solution or taking responsibility for the confusion caused.

[Ola]

61% VOTED FOR AN IDIOT, lah!

SMLJ False sense of security?





.

[Bigiron]

Questions

Regarding the apology:

- What specific actions will be taken to address the public's anxiety and confusion? (A genuine apology should include concrete steps to rectify the situation.)

- What were the specific reasons for the policy change, and why was it implemented without adequate public consultation? (Transparency about the decision-making process is crucial.)

- How will the government ensure that future policy changes are communicated clearly and effectively to the public? ( Preventing similar situations requires a commitment to better communication.)

Regarding the policy itself:

- What are the specific ways in which the current use of NRIC numbers creates a "false sense of security" and makes us vulnerable?( The article needs to provide concrete examples and evidence to support these claims.)

- What are the specific benefits of unmasking NRIC numbers, and how will these benefits outweigh the potential risks? ( The government should clearly articulate the rationale behind the policy change.)

- What safeguards will be put in place to protect individuals' privacy and security in light of the policy change? (Addressing public concerns about data privacy and security is essential.)

Regarding the government's communication:

- Why did the government choose to use the terms "anxiety" and "confusion" to describe the public's reaction, rather than more specific and accurate terms? (This choice of language suggests a potential attempt to downplay the severity of the situation.)

- How does the government intend to address the public's concerns about the policy change beyond simply expressing regret? (A genuine apology should include concrete actions to address the issues raised.)

- Why was the apology released as a news article rather than a formal statement from the government? (This choice of communication raises questions about the government's transparency and accountability.)

[[[ForeverAlone]]]

Imagine if this "misunderstanding" was done by a PTE organisation. Can the CEO say sorry too?

How much will the penalties be?

"Section 48J(1) allows the PDPC to impose a financial penalty on an organisation who is found to have intentionally or negligently contravened its obligations under the PDPA. The maximum fine which can be imposed on an organisation is SGD1 million or 10% of that organisation's annual turnover, whichever is higher."

[Bigiron]

- *Clarification on Policy Change*: Can Minister Josephine Teo elaborate on what specifically prompted the government to reconsider its policy on masking NRIC numbers, and how this change will impact existing regulations ¹?

- *Addressing Public Concerns*: How does the government plan to address concerns from citizens who feel that the unmasking of NRIC numbers may compromise their personal data and privacy ¹?

- *Measures to Prevent Misuse*: What specific measures will the government put in place to prevent the misuse of unmasked NRIC numbers, and how will these measures be enforced ¹?

- *Impact on Businesses and Organizations*: How will this policy change affect businesses and organizations that currently use masked NRIC numbers for verification purposes, and what support will be provided to help them adapt ¹?

- *Future Plans for Data Protection*: Are there any plans to review and update existing data protection laws and regulations to ensure they remain effective in safeguarding citizens' personal data ²?

[p1acebo]

She flip table because she wasn’t voted into the latest PAP CEC.

The ACRA CEO looks sibei sian. Most probably hentak kaki liao. KPI not met, bonus cut

[Bluebull]

No harakiri?
What’s the point?

[p1acebo]

It is a policy U turn. Disgraceful

[whylah]

she was a HR guy.
wonder how she can cope as a MDDI?
the last time when I saw her giving a speech on digital/information stuffs, it was like reading out from a memorized notes.
she looks so jaded, doubt she really understand what she had spoken.😫

[ysh02]

Aiya beginning this year also got "SimplyGo" saga on ENZ card cannot use in MRT or buses ....later take back the idea of SimplyGo.

[Raphael05]

This small space can really F up wherever she goes… haha… no news for so long.. suddenly come out and have to apologize ah!? Haha..

[p1acebo]

Jo Teo also sianz chik pua. Booted out of the CEC. Should be on her way out liao.

The ACRA CEO face super sianz too. Bonus cut

[Alice Alicia]

Funny, nobody resigned or got sacked for all these critical lapses pap is making. 🤔

[RiseofAsia]

Ownself check ownself still can make such low class mistake? 真的是不可思议。

4G leaders really hopless lah
No AOP at all?

First Simply Gone
Then Allianz NTUC deal
Now NRIC unmask
What next?

[RiseofAsia]

Funny, nobody resigned or got sacked for all these critical lapses pap is making. 🤔

No blame culture lah.

[goodboy]

Is she turning transsexual?? Why does she look like an old man?!

[Geneco]

need some advice when gonna apologize for threatening public health by avoiding the latest mRNA jabs lololololololol...

[sclim]

if there is a requirement by data protection, and acra broke it. then those responsible just take the hit la.
no need to drag on. make it more dark only.

the error is nric as identifier should not be used as part of security requirements. public or private using it in that manner has false security and will also take a hit if things happen. as their verifications not fool proof.
just like it is not credible for banks to say users fully responsible for password when it is easy to break when other technology like face identifications, ai fake indentify etc available.

[Buffybuffy]

We paid millions for this?

[Wy:Nox]

JoTeo explaining her huge hiccup by referring to the Past 10 Years when PDPC had restricted the use except by Govt Sectors.

She is still living in 2010 era and not sober yet. There is something wrong with her.

https://youtu.be/-oh8XDPdC1A

[Reddishday]

https://url1.io/vxpVV

[KILLjoy]

[Ola]

What rubbish "FAlse Sense of Security"

So wearing face is False sense of security?

Buying health insurance is also False sense of Security?

Singapore Worst Minister lifts up to her name.

[Alice Alicia]

Pap is providing singkies with a false sense of security.

To feel real sense of security, we must vote them out 😡

[Bigiron]