[Scythian]

"Lacking transparency using "Singapore Govt" to respond to The Guardian & AP articles.

Certainly there are better ways to engage those two reputable international Press.

More importantly when dealing with Singapore's reputation, Why can't someone respond to it more professionally?

[Scythian]

"Lacking transparency using "Singapore Govt" to respond to The Guardian & AP articles.

Certainly there are better ways to engage those two reputable international Press.

More importantly when dealing with Singapore's reputation, Why can't someone respond to it more professionally?

.

This will never happen especially in advanced countries like US, UK, EU, Australia and New Zealand..

[Scythian]

29 July 2023

"Singapore’s envoy to UK refutes The Economist’s claim that CPIB cannot be independent"

https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/p...ndependent

[Scythian]

Why are there inconsistencies when responding to The Guardian and AP articles as compared to The Economist?

Fearing repercussions: Weighting the odds

Can anyone enlighten Sgtalk readers? 

[Jinwului]

no ministir got balls to personally reponse

[Scythian]

no ministir got balls to personally reponse

They very smart to push Singapore ambassador in London to handle The Economist on CPIB and in US, to question Biden Administration why PM Lee wasn't invited 2 years consecutively to Democracy summit in White House.

Why only these officials got balls?

[Alice Alicia]

That's what bullies usually do.
Using the names of the authority.

[Stoki]

no ministir got balls to personally reponse

They jolly well know that pinky and ah jinx were in the wrong. So better hide under the carpet

[Scythian]

They jolly well know that pinky and ah jinx were in the wrong. So better hide under the carpet

All of them sycophants