[Levin]

Read both sides' points at: https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/e-...eo-2120541

[Bigiron]

Lai let read to see it is true 

Ebook:The battle over Lee Kuan Yew’s last will (2)
https://sgtalk.net/Thread-Ebook-The-batt...-last-will

[ODA TETSURO]

Lai let read to see it is true 

Ebook:The battle over Lee Kuan Yew’s last will (2)
https://sgtalk.net/Thread-Ebook-The-batt...-last-will

TLDR...so which part inaccurate?

[Bigiron]

TLDR...so which part inaccurate?

Only they themselves know

[Levin]

TLDR...so which part inaccurate?

1. What the courts found

In his book, Mr Vadaketh wrote that Mr Lee Hsien Yang and Mrs Lee Suet Fern have been “cleared of all suspicion of improper motives or manipulations vis-a-vis Lee Kuan Yew and his will”
However, the Court of Three Judges and the disciplinary tribunal said otherwise, that the couple have not been cleared of all impropriety and had lied under oath and acted dishonestly

2. On whether Mrs Lee Suet Fern made an 'innocent mistake'

Mr Vadaketh wrote that Mrs Lee made an “innocent mistake” in sending Lee Kuan Yew a different version of the will
The Court of Three Judges and the disciplinary tribunal found, though, that she had acted with "complete disregard" for Lee Kuan Yew’s interests, Mr Teo noted
“This was improper, unacceptable, and grossly negligent — it was no innocent mistake,” Mr Teo said

3. On Mr Lee Hsien Yang’s act of cutting out a lawyer from communicating with Lee Kuan Yew

Mr Vadaketh suggests that it was not “shady behaviour” that Mr Lee Hsien Yang excluded Ms Kwa Kim Li, a longtime lawyer of Lee Kuan Yew, from communications with the former prime minister
What the Court of Three Judges and the disciplinary tribunal found was that Mr Lee Hsien Yang could not have known that Lee Kuan Yew would agree to exclude Ms Kwa, since she was the solicitor who had attended to all of his previous wills
Lee Kuan Yew also evidently wanted her to be involved in the execution of his will, Mr Teo said

4. On Lee Kuan Yew's will

Mr Vadaketh wrote that Lee Kuan Yew signed the will that he wanted to sign
The Court of Three Judges and the disciplinary tribunal found that he signed a will that was not what he had wished to sign
He did so because he was misled by Mr Lee Hsien Yang and Mrs Lee, Mr Teo said

5. On Lee Kuan Yew's discussions with his lawyer about reinserting a clause into the will

Mr Vadaketh wrote in his book that the will was based on Lee Kuan Yew's orders and suggests that he had made a conscious decision to include the Demolition Clause in it
However, the Court of Three Judges and the disciplinary tribunal found that he did not have discussions with Ms Kwa about reinserting the clause
Mrs Lee did not tell Lee Kuan Yew that the clause was reinserted into his will


Do read the author's replies in the article too.

[RiseofAsia]

Ask LKY?

[singaporean1964]

jO TEO WANT TO CATCH THE AUTHOR TO PROTECT HIS MASTER AH

[ODA TETSURO]

So just tear down the house lah since PAP gov like to tear down hawker centres and build new wayang.....anyway, it's JUST A HOUSE, not an old hawker centre.

[K88 shu shu]

TLDR...so which part inaccurate?

they say not inaccurate means not accurate, pls don't question the authority.

[ODA TETSURO]

they say not inaccurate means not accurate, pls don't question the authority.