MOH investigating death of 103-year-old who was erroneously given 4th Covid-19 jab
#1

MOH investigating death of 103-year-old who was erroneously given 4th Covid-19 jab 

https://bit.ly/3GyGjI4
Reply
#2

Bloody PAP killing all the dumbfarks.
[+] 8 users Like Notdumb's post
Reply
#3

103 years old. Wonder how long she has been bedridden. Still want to keep her alive longer? Cruel isn't it?
Reply
#4

Family can claim 225k or not?

This is their wish right?
Reply
#5

(04-02-2022, 08:46 PM)Notdumb Wrote:  Bloody PAP killing all the dumbfarks.
Don't come and give a crap again that it is unrelated to vaccine, just because she is 103-year old.
Reply
#6

"Our preliminary findings were that the vaccine was erroneously administered due to possible irregularities in vaccination procedures and poor communication between the nursing home and the medical service provider handling the vaccination," it added.
Reply
#7

So now PAP saying the 4th jab is to kill u.
Tangsen can go try see if its true.🤣🤣🤣
[+] 6 users Like Notdumb's post
Reply
#8

(04-02-2022, 08:55 PM)Gemstar Wrote:  Don't come and give a crap again that it is unrelated to vaccine, just because she is 103-year old.

😭😭😭
Reply
#9

Irregardless of age, no loss when one is confined to nursing home.
Reply
#10

宜康医疗保健菜市疗养院一名103岁老妇被误打第四剂2019冠状病毒疫苗,三天后入院,近一个月后逝。https://bit.ly/3L9E8ht
Reply
#11

(04-02-2022, 09:15 PM)Bigiron Wrote:  宜康医疗保健菜市疗养院一名103岁老妇被误打第四剂2019冠状病毒疫苗,三天后入院,近一个月后逝。https://bit.ly/3L9E8ht

Winning the lottery with your lucky no. is a co-incidence. Uplorry 3 days after mrna jab  is not.
[+] 2 users Like luncheonmeat's post
Reply
#12

Boody .....MOH investigating death of 103-year-old who was erroneously given 4th Covid-19 jab
Reply
#13

(04-02-2022, 09:13 PM)SotongOngTee Wrote:  Irregardless of age, no loss when one is confined to nursing home.

There is no "Ir:

It should be "Regardless of...."
Reply
#14

(04-02-2022, 08:57 PM)cityhantam Wrote:  "Our preliminary findings were that the vaccine was erroneously administered due to possible irregularities in vaccination procedures and poor communication between the nursing home and the medical service provider handling the vaccination," it added.

Which nursing home was it?
[+] 1 user Likes Oyk's post
Reply
#15

(04-02-2022, 10:41 PM)Oyk Wrote:  There is no "Ir:

It should be "Regardless of...."

My England from Geylang, not from Oxford or Cambridge leh. Laughing
[+] 1 user Likes SotongOngTee's post
Reply
#16

103 take what vaccine la his children must be stupid. 103 still want to go Mall jalan meh...
Reply
#17

I dun think it's the vaccine, she is already dying I believe
[+] 1 user Likes maddog's post
Reply
#18

mRNA or inactivated ?
Reply
#19

(04-02-2022, 10:55 PM)Sharexchange Wrote:  103 take what vaccine la his children must be stupid. 103 still want to go Mall jalan meh...
There cud be stringent rules by the nursing home that she has to be vaccinated before she can be admitted to the nursing home.
Reply
#20

At her age, vaccination carry high risks and very limited usefulness.
Stun to read that she take more more than two jabs.

Is the pill not available? Or pill is facade purpose.
Reply
#21

told everyone to vote them out next election. sent them to see LKY and answer to him. open up now so jialat, still want to gst from us.
[+] 2 users Like jus4lucky's post
Reply
#22

If that nurse only he/she have to face the punishment than really no hope....

Should be her/his supervisor also need to be punish as the nurse take order from the top.
Reply
#23

Too old have no economic value. The payment will be little.
Reply
#24

(04-02-2022, 09:13 PM)SotongOngTee Wrote:  Irregardless of age, no loss when one is confined to nursing home.

As long as the death is not due to natural causes, it should be considered a loss!

Before: At your service; After: Serves you right!
[+] 1 user Likes Fit's post
Reply
#25

(04-02-2022, 08:57 PM)cityhantam Wrote:  "Our preliminary findings were that the vaccine was erroneously administered due to possible irregularities in vaccination procedures and poor communication between the nursing home and the medical service provider handling the vaccination," it added.



PAP blame on communication./

Obviously, it is the stupid MOH System that did not record the vaccination status correctly.

Sack Ong YK and Gan KY, lah.

Why do we need 5 Mayors and 80 PAP Ministers? 
[+] 1 user Likes Ola's post
Reply
#26

Just like those Pharma companies in USA use elderly folks for their drug experiment to find the right combination. That brand drug manufacturer must be held responsible and the Govt for using elderly as guinea pigs no excuse %!
[+] 2 users Like A2Z's post
Reply
#27

I thought this procedure never miss since so many communication and written material and technology.
Reply
#28

(05-02-2022, 01:06 AM)theold Wrote:  Too old have no economic value. The payment will be little.

Payment should not be according to value as it is not a court case. It should be according to stipulation issued. If it is according to economic value, a high wage earner would be given millions of $.   

Just like you buy insurance, would it be according to economic value? It is according to contract.  

.
[+] 1 user Likes webinarian's post
Reply
#29

The news report said it was a stroke.   

If it is something that can cause blood-clot, stroke or heart attack, the authority should not force people to take.   

At least, let people choose the vaccine. Why can't people choose inactivated vaccine?  

.
Reply
#30

(04-02-2022, 11:36 PM)watchfirst9 Wrote:  At her age, vaccination carry high risks and very limited usefulness.
Stun to read that she take more more than two jabs.

Is the pill not available? Or pill is facade purpose.

Those vaccinated differentiated measures are forcing people to take the vaccines even if they have other illness. People want to go malls and enjoy food, enjoy freedom. Govt making use of this to force people to jab mRNA. Very evil.
[+] 3 users Like winbig's post
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)