Posts: 19,787
   
Threads: 704
    
Likes Received: 7,699 in 6,308 posts
Likes Given: 5,950
Heng arh! I am not as stewpig as 65%.
Raise 30% for FTs but only 2% for Citizens
Sack half the Mayors & PAP Ministers
>
The following 1 user Likes Ola's post:1 user Likes Ola's post
• Bigiron
Posts: 54,571
   
Threads: 40,143
    
Likes Received: 6,440 in 6,050 posts
Likes Given: 68,652
Here’s a bullshit detector breakdown of the article’s claims:
---
🔥 Claim 1: “Nearly 80% of companies raised salaries in 2024”
🧠 Bullshit Level: High
Why it's BS:
The official MOM data for 2023 showed only 65.6% of firms gave raises — lower than the year before (72.2%).
There is no verified MOM data yet for 2024 proving “nearly 80%” raised wages.
This is likely spin or premature optimism, not fact.
---
🔥 Claim 2: “Real wages rose 3.2% last year too”
🧠 Bullshit Level: Very High
Why it's BS:
MOM officially reported that real wages rose just 0.4% in 2023.
That’s after adjusting for inflation — which is the correct way to measure real wage growth.
3.2% could be nominal wage growth (before inflation), but saying “real wages” rose 3.2% is outright wrong.
---
⚠️ Claim 3: “Admin and support services saw an average 8.7% increase, thanks to the Progressive Wage Model”
🧠 Bullshit Level: Medium
Why it's half-BS:
This has a basis in truth — admin and support services did see significant wage growth due to the PWM.
But the actual MOM figure was 7.1%, not 8.7%.
The article inflates the number to make the policy look more successful.
Could be cherry-picking a subgroup to juice the stat.
---
🎯 Bottom Line:
This article is a textbook case of statistical spin. It uses:
Inflated or misattributed numbers
Misuse of economic terms like “real wages”
Cherry-picked stats with no proper sourcing
Conclusion:
It smells like bullshit with a touch of government PR gloss — possibly to paint a rosier economic picture ahead of a major political event like Singapore GE 2025.
Posts: 54,571
   
Threads: 40,143
    
Likes Received: 6,440 in 6,050 posts
Likes Given: 68,652