NATO is powerless against hypersonic weapons
#1
Information 

NATO is powerless against hypersonic weapons - the missiles can also carry nuclear warheads. 

The Union calls for an expansion of capabilities, traffic light representatives are combative. When asked whether Russia is committing genocide in Ukraine, one is reluctant.


After Russia, according to its own statements, used the hypersonic missile "Kinzhal" in Ukraine, the Union faction in the Bundestag is demanding a reaction from NATO. 

Defense politician Johann Wadephul (CDU) told WELT: "The use of the hypersonic weapon is a real test before the eyes of the world and a signal to NATO: 'Do not interfere, because we have weapons against which you can hardly defend yourself can.' Unfortunately, NATO has this capability gap that we urgently need to close.”


https://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/...-Nato.html
[+] 1 user Likes theold's post
Reply
#2

dat why they get too close for comfort
only 5 minutes for Putin
he must go below dat so his 'seeds' in hardened bubkers can survive
meaning pre-emptive strikes
[+] 1 user Likes singlon's post
Reply
#3

(21-03-2022, 07:47 AM)theold Wrote:  NATO is powerless against hypersonic weapons - the missiles can also carry nuclear warheads. 

The Union calls for an expansion of capabilities, traffic light representatives are combative. When asked whether Russia is committing genocide in Ukraine, one is reluctant.


After Russia, according to its own statements, used the hypersonic missile "Kinzhal" in Ukraine, the Union faction in the Bundestag is demanding a reaction from NATO. 

Defense politician Johann Wadephul (CDU) told WELT: "The use of the hypersonic weapon is a real test before the eyes of the world and a signal to NATO: 'Do not interfere, because we have weapons against which you can hardly defend yourself can.' Unfortunately, NATO has this capability gap that we urgently need to close.”
Actually closing the gab is not enough to stop hypersonic. At most it is a draw. To defend against hypersonic, NATO needs something faster than hypersonic for interception. It needs super-hypersonic......... Rolleyes

 Thinking is difficult, that's why most people judge
                    Carl Jung
Reply
#4

From what i read, hypersonic is superior not because it is too fast for interception

Hypersonic works because it can hv a much lower trajectory, and hence, radar cannot detect it until too late and too near
[+] 1 user Likes Sentinel's post
Reply
#5

Russia is now playing with fire.  Are they admitting they are losing the Ukraine war using conventional weapons?  Many countries today have supersonic weapons.  If they are not carefully playing with this stuff,  such fire playing can develop into World World 3.  What the rest should not do is add fuel to the fire.  Instead,  we should all condemn the use of such weapons.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/...-quicktake
Reply
#6

Heard this Kinzhal is entry level.

There are faster ones in Russia arsenal.



Smile
[+] 1 user Likes Niubee's post
Reply
#7

[Image: 817-DB11-F-F087-407-A-B844-E27-E36460-B96.jpg]

how to determine aspect ratio of monitor
[+] 1 user Likes CHAOS's post
Reply
#8

all these know nut comie liars in this forum.
hypersonic missile was invented by US, now US even has hypersonic interceptor to stopit, US already installed the hypersonic interceptor in Japan, US can install in anywhere they like today.
US hypersonic missile is more powerful & accurate is simple as such fast speed missile need super high speed IC to control with ton of computation, russia IC is at least 5 generation older than US, US has the latest from TSMC, most complex & highest speed & powerful.
Whatever russia has, NATO& US have more advanced,no need for them to show hands for now.
the more russia use, the more Russia will be totally destroy in near future, just a desperation act by moronic putin.
Russia use hypersonic today means their Ukraine war already lost. If use nukes mean russia totally lost in this world.
all these moronic know nut comie dogs here.
Reply
#9

(21-03-2022, 08:53 AM)revealer Wrote:  Russia is now playing with fire.  Are they admitting they are losing the Ukraine war using conventional weapons?  Many countries today have supersonic weapons.  If they are not carefully playing with this stuff,  such fire playing can develop into World World 3.  What the rest should not do is add fuel to the fire.  Instead,  we should all condemn the use of such weapons.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/...-quicktake

Quote from your link.
You are right many countries have supersonic weapon. US and NATO and Japan can bomb Russia to smithereens 

China, the U.S., and Russia have the most advanced capabilities, and several other countries are investigating the technology, including India, Japan, Australia, France, Germany and North Korea, which claims to have tested a hypersonic missile.
  • Russia: Its Avangard is a glide vehicle launched from an intercontinental ballistic missile and will reportedly carry a nuclear warhead. Russian news sources claim it entered into combat duty in December 2019. Tsirkon is a ship-launched cruise missile said to be capable of striking both ground and naval targets.
  • China: Its military conducted possibly two hypersonic weapons tests over the summer, including the launch into space of an orbiting hypersonic weapon capable of carrying a nuclear payload. The Financial Times first reported the tests. China has disputed reports of the tests, saying it simply launched a reusable space vehicle. Previously, China conducted a number of successful tests of the DF-17, a medium-range ballistic missile designed to launch hypersonic glide vehicles. U.S. intelligence analysts assess that it may now be deployed. China has also tested the DF-41 intercontinental ballistic missile, which could be modified to carry a conventional or nuclear glide vehicle.
  • The U.S.: Gregory Hayes, chief executive officer of U.S. defense contractor Raytheon Technologies Corp.told Bloomberg TVOct. 26 that the U.S. is “at least several years behind” China in hypersonic technology despite significant investment. Development funding increased approximately 740% in the five years before 2020 and is expected to total almost $15 billion between 2015 and 2024, not including production costs. The U.S. Navy leads the development of a glide vehicle for use across the military branches, while the Air Force is working on an air-launched glider. The government’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, with Air Force support, is developing an air-launched hypersonic cruise missile, according to CRS.
Reply
#10

(21-03-2022, 09:38 AM)kokee Wrote:  all these know nut comie liars in this forum.
hypersonic missile was invented by US, now US even has hypersonic interceptor to stopit, US already installed the hypersonic interceptor in Japan, US can install in anywhere they like today.
US hypersonic missile is more powerful & accurate is simple as such fast speed missile need super high speed IC to control with ton of computation, russia IC is at least 5 generation older than US, US has the latest from TSMC, most complex & highest speed & powerful.
Whatever russia has, NATO& US have more advanced,no need for them to show hands for now.
the more russia use, the more Russia will be totally destroy in near future, just a desperation act by moronic putin.
Russia use hypersonic today means their Ukraine war already lost. If use nukes mean russia totally lost in this world.
all these moronic know nut comie dogs here.

Yeah spot on! 
US and NATO can use their hypersonic weapon and bomb Russia to smithereens
Reply
#11

(21-03-2022, 10:03 AM)Alam Wrote:  Quote from your link.

Now using Alam to support Kokee in propagating LIES and FAKE NEWS ?  Rotfl
[+] 2 users Like cityhantam's post
Reply
#12

(21-03-2022, 10:12 AM)cityhantam Wrote:  Now using Alam to support Kokee in propagating LIES and FAKE NEWS ?  Rotfl

Gesti-109
[+] 1 user Likes Fleetdestroyer's post
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)