[Bigiron]

Ng Chee Meng issues lawyer's letter to Facebook user over 'false, misleading & defamatory' allegations - Mothership.SG - News from Singapore, Asia and around the world
https://mothership.sg/2025/05/ng-chee-me...ource=tele&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=MS

[Ola]

Previously, Ng responded to allegations about the photo and explained that he is often approached for photographs at engagements which he attends as secretary-general of NTUC.

---------------------------------------------

Chey! Singapore Zoo Ah- Meng more cute than him

Unless approach him in National Events ie NTUC Union Fighting Day / Labour Day

But those days are nothing meaningful yet he took photo for private reasons?


I am not as stewpig as Jac Fart King.

[Cmpunk]

He scare use lawyer letter to threaten people.

[Bigiron]

Ng Chee Meng issues lawyer's letter to Facebook user over 'false, misleading & defamatory' allegations - Mothership.SG - News from Singapore, Asia and around the world
https://mothership.sg/2025/05/ng-chee-me...ource=tele&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=MS

Questions:

1.If the dinner was part of official engagement with private sector stakeholders, why did Sam Goi and others describe it as a private, informal gathering among friends?

2. How does Ng Chee Meng reconcile the discrepancy between the stated purpose of the dinner and the lack of transparency about who was invited and why?

3. Given the controversy over the timeline, can Ng Chee Meng clarify the exact date of the dinner and whether it complied with COVID-19 restrictions at that time?

4. What steps did Ng Chee Meng take to ensure that attendees at such private dinners did not present reputational or legal risks, especially given Su Haijin’s later criminal conviction?

5. Why was there no clear declaration or record of the dinner, as required by civil service protocols for gifts or benefits above a certain value?

6. How does Ng Chee Meng address public concerns about perceived elitism and special access for certain business figures, especially when such access is not available to ordinary citizens?

7. If ministers and public figures are expected to uphold higher standards, why was there a lack of proactive communication or accountability when the controversy surfaced?

8. Does Ng Chee Meng believe that simply not knowing Su Haijin personally is sufficient to address concerns about judgment and association, given the repeated presence of Su at elite gatherings?

Health Minister Ong Ye Kung and Transport Minister Chee Hong Tat have issued lawyers’ letters to a man who alleged that they condoned Fujian gang member Su Haijin's illegal activities. https://cna.asia/43qaYpl

Questions :

1. If they claim not to know Su Haijin personally, what steps did they or their offices take to vet the guest list before attending these private dinners, especially given their positions as ministers?

2. How do they explain Su Haijin “happening to be there” at multiple, invitation-only gatherings-do they consider this a coincidence, and what does this suggest about the exclusivity or nature of these events?

3.they state that ministers meet a diverse range of people as part of their duties. How do they differentiate between large public events and small, private dinners in terms of accountability and transparency?

4. Why were the details of the dinners, including the identities of the hosts and other guests, not disclosed in your statements, given public interest and the potential for reputational risk?

5. Do they believe that simply denying personal knowledge of Su Haijin is sufficient to address public concerns about association and judgment, especially after his conviction for money laundering?

6. How do they ensure that participation in private social gatherings does not inadvertently confer legitimacy or access to individuals later found to be involved in criminal activity?

7. Given the repeated presence of Su Haijin at such events, what will they do differently in the future to prevent similar situations and uphold the high standards of integrity you referenced in their statements?

[revealer]

玩火终被火烧

[babygirl]

Ng Chee Meng issues lawyer's letter to Facebook user over 'false, misleading & defamatory' allegations - Mothership.SG - News from Singapore, Asia and around the world
https://mothership.sg/2025/05/ng-chee-me...ource=tele&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=MS

Questions:

1.If the dinner was part of official engagement with private sector stakeholders, why did Sam Goi and others describe it as a private, informal gathering among friends?

2. How does Ng Chee Meng reconcile the discrepancy between the stated purpose of the dinner and the lack of transparency about who was invited and why?

3. Given the controversy over the timeline, can Ng Chee Meng clarify the exact date of the dinner and whether it complied with COVID-19 restrictions at that time?

4. What steps did Ng Chee Meng take to ensure that attendees at such private dinners did not present reputational or legal risks, especially given Su Haijin’s later criminal conviction?

5. Why was there no clear declaration or record of the dinner, as required by civil service protocols for gifts or benefits above a certain value?

6. How does Ng Chee Meng address public concerns about perceived elitism and special access for certain business figures, especially when such access is not available to ordinary citizens?

7. If ministers and public figures are expected to uphold higher standards, why was there a lack of proactive communication or accountability when the controversy surfaced?

8. Does Ng Chee Meng believe that simply not knowing Su Haijin personally is sufficient to address concerns about judgment and association, given the repeated presence of Su at elite gatherings?

Health Minister Ong Ye Kung and Transport Minister Chee Hong Tat have issued lawyers’ letters to a man who alleged that they condoned Fujian gang member Su Haijin's illegal activities. https://cna.asia/43qaYpl

Questions :

1. If they claim not to know Su Haijin personally, what steps did they or their offices take to vet the guest list before attending these private dinners, especially given their positions as ministers?

2. How do they explain Su Haijin “happening to be there” at multiple, invitation-only gatherings-do they consider this a coincidence, and what does this suggest about the exclusivity or nature of these events?

3.they state that ministers meet a diverse range of people as part of their duties. How do they differentiate between large public events and small, private dinners in terms of accountability and transparency?

4. Why were the details of the dinners, including the identities of the hosts and other guests, not disclosed in your statements, given public interest and the potential for reputational risk?

5. Do they believe that simply denying personal knowledge of Su Haijin is sufficient to address public concerns about association and judgment, especially after his conviction for money laundering?

6. How do they ensure that participation in private social gatherings does not inadvertently confer legitimacy or access to individuals later found to be involved in criminal activity?

7. Given the repeated presence of Su Haijin at such events, what will they do differently in the future to prevent similar situations and uphold the high standards of integrity you referenced in their statements?

[singaporean1964]

less than 1 mth elected
already true color come out

no wonder many pple dont trust him.

instead of threatening pple with lawyer letter
he should just sit down and have a talk with the fb guy

[Gstalk]

Got proof what in the photo shoot and even can “cheers” with the crook

[Bigiron]

https://youtu.be/KTgmNQfX2NI?si=05esamq6TRsaehxL

[Bluebull]

Instead of calling a press conference to face the public
To clarify matters, to answer questions
He sues
Typical coward

[p1acebo]

Even TT Durai sued and won, in the beginning

[theold]

A defamation case is very expensive.

[Cmpunk]

Suing is the only outcome not many can take it even it’s true. Very costly and people may drop the case so even the whole incident is wrong doing so we normal citizen have to suck thumb.

[Ola]

Instead of calling a press conference to face the public
To clarify matters, to answer questions
He sues
Typical coward

Likely those Ministers cannot explain their actions and doing

so the best option is to sue to make a person shut up

[RiseofAsia]

Likely those Ministers cannot explain their actions and doing

so the best option is to sue to make a person shut up

You cant make all the ppl shut up lah.
Only the brave man dare to admit his mistake.

[Scythian]

Instead of calling a press conference to face the public
To clarify matters, to answer questions
He sues
Typical coward

You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all of the time, but you cannot fool all the people all of the time

[webinarian]

 
What is the statement which is alleged to be defamatory?    


.

[Gemstar]

Instead of calling a press conference to face the public
To clarify matters, to answer questions
He sues
Typical coward

All these men in white love sueing. They are all the same and born to sue.

[Scythian]

You cant make all the ppl shut up lah.
Only the brave man dare to admit his mistake.

Singapore is a member of the United Nations. It officially became a member on September 21, 1965, after gaining independence on August 9, 1965. "

The UN explicitly supports freedom of speech as a fundamental human right, enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and other international instruments. 

Specifically, Article 19 of the UDHR guarantees everyone the right to freedom of opinion and expression, including the freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive, and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers. 

[jus4lucky]

suing someone will not proved anything if the truths is not uncovered. when you have the financial ability to sued, and if you really do something not right , the truth will never be found out since the other party dont have the financial ability to fight against, what the point.

[Alice Alicia]

Good. Let the court expose more felonies.

[Sentinel]

Ng Chee Meng issues lawyer's letter to Facebook user over 'false, misleading & defamatory' allegations - Mothership.SG - News from Singapore, Asia and around the world
https://mothership.sg/2025/05/ng-chee-me...ource=tele&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=MS

He should spend time with his ward

[Bluebull]

I have a suggestion for NCM to gain back his credibility and reputation
Resign as MP for Jalan Kayu and stand agin in the by election
And let the people decide if they accept your behavior
If you sue it shows you are weak

Remember this famous quote

[Bluebull]

I have a suggestion for NCM to gain back his credibility and reputation
Resign as MP for Jalan Kayu and stand again in the bye election
And let the people decide if they believe in you
If every time someone criticises you, you sue,it shows you are weak

Remember this famous quote

[Ola]

Actually, NCM got reputation meh?

Because his backing call is SM Lee so he can go around and sue others?

[Bluebull]

And remember……..

[luncheonmeat]

less than 1 mth elected
already true color come out

no wonder many pple dont trust him.

instead of threatening pple with lawyer letter
he should just sit down and have a talk with the fb guy

NCM got no choice. The other 2 ministars have oredy sent legal letters to kill chicken warn monkeys, pple asking why NCM never follow suit take action.
Actually the FB guy dint accuse the ministars of anything, just compain 1 set of rules for high SES, another for commoners, why must say sorry?

[Gemstar]

NCM got no choice. The other 2 ministars have oredy sent legal letters to kill chicken warn monkeys, pple asking why NCM never follow suit take action.
Actually the FB guy dint accuse the ministars of anything, just compain 1 set of rules for high SES, another for commoners, why must say sorry?

I am simply pisss-off with big bullies. All these people thought they are in the highest status and resort to such disgusting behaviours by using threats. Thought only gangsters hv this mindset.

[Scythian]

I am simply pisss-off with big bullies. All these people thought they are in the highest status and resort to such disgusting behaviours by using threats. Thought only gangsters hv this mindset.

certainly, forcing that poor guy into bankruptcy

[Bluebull]