[forum456]

https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/la...ch-1974641

[forum456]

Does it mean that the marriage definition will change if PAP loses in the next election ?

if yes, LGBT voters will not vote for PAP because they want to change the marriage definition .

[Ola]

LHL's mouth speaker talking again

Sianz . . . . .

[winbig]

Does it mean that the marriage definition will change if PAP loses in the next election ?

if yes, LGBT voters will not vote for PAP because they want to change the marriage definition .

But non-LGBT will vote for PAP to keep the status quo

[Truebluesg]

Sounds like intentional blackmail...?

[Migrant]

What's in a family?
Without a father and a mother,
An adopted child definitely not their product.
Its just 'borrowing' someone's kid and call it yours. 
What goes around comes around.

[RichDad]

Does it mean that the marriage definition will change if PAP loses in the next election ?

if yes, LGBT voters will not vote for PAP because they want to change the marriage definition .

No oppies will campaign on the promise to change marriage definition. That will be suicidal.

So all will promise no change.

Can vote oppies safely. LGBTQ votes are not powerful enough.

[Truebluesg]

No oppies will campaign on the promise to change marriage definition. That will be suicidal.

So all will promise no change.

Can vote oppies safely. LGBTQ votes are not powerful enough.

Or are they betting on the fact that the boomers , conservatives and religious will probably die off in 15 years and then someone can finally come out of the closet.
Since the definition of marriage is not enshrined in the constitution, parliament can decide that the definition of marriage is whatever they want it to be lor.

[Ichigo]

When you garner 60% of the votes but hold 90% of the seats, what is this talk about losing? Presuming they win 50% of the votes, they will most likely still be the majority, given their great talent in redrawing the boundaries. Hats off to them!

[Teeth53]

LHL's mouth speaker talking again

Sianz . . . . .

Singapore founding father Lee Kuan Yew, marries boyfriend Heng Yirui – and Chinese social media users cheer them on

“I believe my father would have been thrilled to know this,” Li’s dad Lee Hsien Yang said

Sex between men remains illegal in Singapore but the city state’s first PM had been known to express a different opinion from the government in his later years...

[Teeth53]

He marries boyfriend Heng Yirui – and Chinese social media users cheer them on

“I believe my father would have been thrilled to know this,” Li’s dad Lee Hsien Yang said

Sex between men remains illegal in Singapore but the city state’s first PM had been known to express a different opinion from the government in his later years...

https://amp.scmp.com/news/asia/southeast...e-kuan-yew

[singlon]

intermission

[Sentinel]

Or are they betting on the fact that the boomers , conservatives and religious will probably die off in 15 years and then someone can finally come out of the closet.
Since the definition of marriage is not enshrined in the constitution, parliament can decide that the definition of marriage is whatever they want it to be lor.

Already said, it is not the marriage definition that will çhange

It is the gender definition that will change and already happening in USA and PAP follows USA sheet

[cheekopekman]

https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/la...ch-1974641

What if PAP lost leh? What if he died leh?

[Truebluesg]

What if PAP lost leh? What if he died leh?

Yes that is why it is essential that they enshrine in the constitution that a marriage can only be between a man and a woman
instead they want to amend the constitution so that any party with a 50% voting majority in parliament can define what a marriage is . ie between man and  animal, man and man , man and robot...
if PAP lost or if he died , or even if he wins, a marriage can still be changed at any time to between a man and a man since it is not enshrined in the constitution.

Basically hypocrites who think the citizens are seriously stupid

[ArielCasper]

Does it mean that the marriage definition will change if PAP loses in the next election ?

if yes, LGBT voters will not vote for PAP because they want to change the marriage definition ."

Was about to say the same thing. "Does it mean that the marriage definition will change if PAP loses in the next election

[Truebluesg]

essentially blackmail
So the clever opposition parties could now declare that they will be willing to enshrine the definition of marriage in the constitution if they comprise more than 50% of parliament.
Then the conservatives ( majority of Singaporean voters ) will swing their votes where it makes sense.

[singlon]

Protest in NZ Jab kills people.

[menghuii]

are straight people very sua ku?
what world are we living in?