PAP Defends Itself Against Binance Stance Post FTX Fallout
#1

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/...emium-asia&leadSource=uverify%20wall

orce
Licking Uncle Sam by forcing Binance and Binance.sg to close the operation here while keeping FTX active. 
But Binance supposed to be one to save FXT.

So karma served?  Laughing
Reply
#2

Temasek invest into FTX. Of course must kill of binance since its their competitor
Reply
#3

(21-11-2022, 07:02 PM)IndianChief Wrote:  Temasek invest into FTX. Of course must kill of binance since its their competitor

Singapore doesn't take sides

Singapore based on Principles
Reply
#4

The Monetary Authority of Singapore defended its stance on Binance.com and collapsed crypto exchange FTX, following criticisms about the differing treatment of the two firms since the regulator had previously alerted the public to Binance.com.

The “clear difference” between the two was that Binance.com was “actively soliciting” users in the city-state, to the extent of offering listing in Singapore dollars among other incentives, while FTX was not, the MAS said in a statement on Monday. In response to “questions and misconceptions” that it was possible to protect local users who dealt with FTX, such as by ringfencing their assets or ensuring that FTX backed its assets with reserves, the MAS reiterated that FTX isn’t licensed in the country and again warned about

I, being poor, have only my dreams; I have spread my dreams under your feet; Tread softly because you tread on my dreams.
Reply
#5

(21-11-2022, 05:54 PM)merline Wrote:  https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/...emium-asia&leadSource=uverify%20wall

orce
Licking Uncle Sam by forcing Binance and Binance.sg to close the operation here while keeping FTX active. 
But Binance supposed to be one to save FXT.

So karma served?  Laughing

China licking own wounds now. No need other country lick them.

Tounge
Reply
#6

(21-11-2022, 07:05 PM)sgbuffett Wrote:  The Monetary Authority of Singapore defended its stance on Binance.com and collapsed crypto exchange FTX, following criticisms about the differing treatment of the two firms since the regulator had previously alerted the public to Binance.com.

The “clear difference” between the two was that Binance.com was “actively soliciting” users in the city-state, to the extent of offering listing in Singapore dollars among other incentives, while FTX was not, the MAS said in a statement on Monday. In response to “questions and misconceptions” that it was possible to protect local users who dealt with FTX, such as by ringfencing their assets or ensuring that FTX backed its assets with reserves, the MAS reiterated that FTX isn’t licensed in the country and again warned about

I don't understand...MAS is saying Binance was banned because it gave a better deal to users.

It just makes zero sense and is illogical

I, being poor, have only my dreams; I have spread my dreams under your feet; Tread softly because you tread on my dreams.
Reply
#7

Can post full article? cannot read becuz no subs.

Thanks.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)