Posts: 670
   
Threads: 186
    
Likes Received: 383 in 319 posts
Likes Given: 26
Temasek invest into FTX. Of course must kill of binance since its their competitor
Posts: 21,903
   
Threads: 2,989
    
Likes Received: 3,392 in 2,896 posts
Likes Given: 2,330
(21-11-2022, 07:02 PM)IndianChief Wrote: Temasek invest into FTX. Of course must kill of binance since its their competitor
Singapore doesn't take sides
Singapore based on Principles
Posts: 26,048
   
Threads: 7,540
    
Likes Received: 4,497 in 3,546 posts
Likes Given: 633
The Monetary Authority of Singapore defended its stance on Binance.com and collapsed crypto exchange FTX, following criticisms about the differing treatment of the two firms since the regulator had previously alerted the public to Binance.com.
The “clear difference” between the two was that Binance.com was “actively soliciting” users in the city-state, to the extent of offering listing in Singapore dollars among other incentives, while FTX was not, the MAS said in a statement on Monday. In response to “questions and misconceptions” that it was possible to protect local users who dealt with FTX, such as by ringfencing their assets or ensuring that FTX backed its assets with reserves, the MAS reiterated that FTX isn’t licensed in the country and again warned about
I, being poor, have only my dreams; I have spread my dreams under your feet; Tread softly because you tread on my dreams.
>
Posts: 1,841
   
Threads: 8
    
Likes Received: 342 in 297 posts
Likes Given: 109
(21-11-2022, 05:54 PM)merline Wrote: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/...emium-asia&leadSource=uverify%20wall
orce
Licking Uncle Sam by forcing Binance and Binance.sg to close the operation here while keeping FTX active.
But Binance supposed to be one to save FXT.
So karma served?
China licking own wounds now. No need other country lick them.
Posts: 26,048
   
Threads: 7,540
    
Likes Received: 4,497 in 3,546 posts
Likes Given: 633
(21-11-2022, 07:05 PM)sgbuffett Wrote: The Monetary Authority of Singapore defended its stance on Binance.com and collapsed crypto exchange FTX, following criticisms about the differing treatment of the two firms since the regulator had previously alerted the public to Binance.com.
The “clear difference” between the two was that Binance.com was “actively soliciting” users in the city-state, to the extent of offering listing in Singapore dollars among other incentives, while FTX was not, the MAS said in a statement on Monday. In response to “questions and misconceptions” that it was possible to protect local users who dealt with FTX, such as by ringfencing their assets or ensuring that FTX backed its assets with reserves, the MAS reiterated that FTX isn’t licensed in the country and again warned about
I don't understand...MAS is saying Binance was banned because it gave a better deal to users.
It just makes zero sense and is illogical
I, being poor, have only my dreams; I have spread my dreams under your feet; Tread softly because you tread on my dreams.
>
Posts: 403
   
Threads: 73
    
Likes Received: 234 in 156 posts
Likes Given: 402
Can post full article? cannot read becuz no subs.
Thanks.